Understanding the Relationship Between A and B: A Variation Analysis

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChrisVer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variation
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between variations in a function A, defined as A = f(B), and the differential of A. It explores whether the variation δA can be equated to the differential dA, leading to the expression δA = (df/dB) δB. The conversation highlights the application of Taylor's theorem to derive this relationship, particularly with the function f(x) = 1/√x. However, complications arise when a constant is added to the function, revealing that the variation depends on the specific form of f(B) and emphasizing that constants do not influence the variation in the same way as the variable terms. The conclusion affirms that while variations can be analyzed through Taylor expansion, the presence of constants requires careful consideration.
ChrisVer
Science Advisor
Messages
3,372
Reaction score
465
Suppose I have such an equation:
A= f(B)
so A is a function of B.

Can I really use the fact that a variation of A is like taking the differential of it?
\delta A= dA

so that:

\delta A = \frac{d f(B)}{dB} \delta B
?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Superficially it looks OK. You need to look at the definition involved for variation.
 
the reason I ask is because I have a confusion with one more way to see variation.
Suppose I vary B, so that A is going to be varied too:

A+ \delta A = f(B+\delta B)
And suppose f(x) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}

Then:

A( 1+ \frac{\delta A}{A}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{B+\delta B}}= \frac{1}{\sqrt{B}} \frac{1}{\sqrt{1+\frac{\delta B}{B}}}≈ A -A \frac{1}{2} \frac{\delta B}{B}

\frac{\delta A}{A}= - \frac{1}{2} \frac{\delta B}{B}This result would imply that:
\frac{d f(B)}{dB} = -\frac{1}{2}\frac{A}{B}

in my OP...

with a simple check, we have:

\frac{d (1/ \sqrt{B})}{dB} = -\frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{B^{3/2}}

This method works fine for such an easy function as f(x)=\frac{1}{\sqrt{x}}
Now suppose I have instead:
f(x)= \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} + c

with c a constant. The same method won't work because I will end up with something like:

\frac{\delta A}{A} = - \frac{1}{A} \frac{1}{2} \frac{1}{\sqrt{B}} \frac{\delta B}{B}

unfortunately now \frac{1}{A} can't be canceled with the \frac{1}{\sqrt{x}} ... Only maybe, up to some error, if I consider c very small... The derivative however will kill c and give some other result (the same as for without c which I think is more physical- isn't it? a constant shouldn't destroy the variations)..
 
Last edited:
I think I found my misconception... the variation is still independent of c... it's 1/A which gives me that dependence. So there's no way to escape from c rather than neglecting it :) that's fine...i guess
 
You can basically use Taylor expansion to show your equality.

If ##A=f(B)## and we add a small quantity ##\delta B## to ##B## then by Taylor's theorem we will have:

$$A'\equiv A+\delta A=f(B+\delta B)=f(B)+\frac{df}{dB}\delta B+\mathcal{O}(\delta B^2)$$

This gives as the limit ##\delta B\rightarrow 0##:

$$\delta A=\frac{df}{dB}\delta B$$

Of course, this is usually much more interesting when we consider functionals rather than simple functions.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top