Understanding the Relationship Between Electromagnetic Fields and Waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paper
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Electromagnetic
AI Thread Summary
Passing a current through a wire generates a magnetic field perpendicular to the flow, with alternating current (AC) causing this field to continuously change. The near field, which is close to the source, has a strong effect from individual poles, while the far field, further away, sees these effects cancel out, leading to a different decay rate of the field. Inductive coupling relies on the magnetic field inducing current in a secondary coil, while receiving radio waves involves a separate phenomenon where electromagnetic waves induce alternating current in a wire. The discussion clarifies that the terms near field and far field can be confusing, as they represent a continuum rather than distinct zones. Understanding these concepts is crucial for grasping the relationship between electromagnetic fields and waves.
Paper
Messages
14
Reaction score
1
Hello,
I'm confused about the whole electromagnet thing. So far I've got these concepts:
- Passing a current through a wire results in a magnetic field 90 degress to the direction of flow

- If the current is AC, the magnetic field is continuously alternating

- This magnetic field is considered to be a near field and can be used to perform inductive coupling

- In addition, this AC current causes the wire to radiate electromagnetic waves (radio frequency light). This is part of the far field

- If we alternate at the natural resonance frequency of a wire or coil, we set up standing waves in the transmitter

- And so the receiver needs only to be designed with the same resonance frequency, and an incoming electromagnetic wave of the correct frequency will cause resonance and standing waves in the receiver

Now my questions are:
* Is that all correct?
* What is the difference between a near field magnetic field and far field electromagnetic waves?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you pretty much have it, in general.

The near field is close to the radiator such that the effect of an individual pole is strong, and this field falls off with the radius squared. The far field is some distance from the radiator such that the effects of opposite poles begin to cancel and the net field falls with the cube of the radius. There is no single, well-defined distance at which the near field gives way to the far field; it's a continuum.
 
I think it's clicked. Forget the labels near field and far field, I'm getting them mixed I think.

Inductive Coupling depends on the magnetic field shifting electrons in the secondary coil.

I guess that receiving radio waves is a completely separate thing? What is the name for the effect in which a wave causes an alternating current in a wire? The Maxwell Effect? Or perhaps the Tesla Effect?
 
For a dc current in the wire, tere is a small electric field along the wire due to the resistance in the wire. If there is no resistance, there is no voltage drop in the wire and no electric field. The magnetic field from the current surrounds the wire (in circles). It is only azimuthal (no radial component). If you have an ac current, you will have an ac magnetic field. If the ac frequency is many megahertz, the wire will start radiating energy, like a transmitter antenna.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top