Understanding the Relationship between Square Roots and Absolute Values

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between square roots and absolute values, particularly focusing on the expressions sqrt(x^2) and their implications when x is negative. Participants also explore the computability of square roots of negative numbers in the real number system.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants examine whether sqrt(x^2) is equivalent to |x| and discuss the implications of this equivalence when x is negative. They also question the validity of computing sqrt[-3]*sqrt[-3] in the real plane and consider the role of complex numbers in this context.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the definitions of square roots and the loss of information when squaring negative numbers. There is an ongoing exploration of whether complex numbers need to be introduced for certain calculations, with various interpretations being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the limitations of standard calculators in handling complex numbers, which may lead to errors in computation. The discussion also highlights the importance of understanding the principal root definition in relation to the square root function.

khurram usman
Messages
86
Reaction score
0
absolute value help ...

i am a bit confused about two things...
first: is sqrt(x^2) is the same thing as |x|? if yes then consider a negative no. 'z' ... i had a question like this: sqrt(z^2)...its answer was -z...so i suppose this means that this square root/ square and absolute value thing is the same and since z is negative so we say that answer is -z which will obviously be positive.

second: its related to the first one.
consider sqrt[-3]*sqrt[-3]
is this even computable in the real plane? i am asking this because the calculator was given a mth error...on the other hand alphawolfram resource was giving -3
i am with the resource on this because if my first question is correct then it is the same thing that is sqrt(-3)^2
so clarify all this
 
Physics news on Phys.org


khurram usman said:
i am a bit confused about two things...
first: is sqrt(x^2) is the same thing as |x|? if yes then consider a negative no. 'z' ... i had a question like this: sqrt(z^2)...its answer was -z...so i suppose this means that this square root/ square and absolute value thing is the same and since z is negative so we say that answer is -z which will obviously be positive.
The definition of sqrt(x) is taking the principal root of x, which is just the positive value. It's different to solving the equation y2=x for y, because in that case we get [itex]y=\pm\sqrt{x}[/itex] which is both the positive and negative of sqrt(x).
So what this means is that if we take some number, then we square it, we've lost some information about the number - mainly whether it was positive or negative to begin with. For this reason, if we consider [itex]\sqrt{x^2}[/itex] since we need to square x first, then we take the square root again, we don't end up back at x exactly, unless x was positive. If x was negative then we've lost that information and that's why the answer is |x|.
khurram usman said:
second: its related to the first one.
consider sqrt[-3]*sqrt[-3]
is this even computable in the real plane? i am asking this because the calculator was given a mth error...on the other hand alphawolfram resource was giving -3
i am with the resource on this because if my first question is correct then it is the same thing that is sqrt(-3)^2
so clarify all this
This time it's different. We now have [tex](\sqrt{x})^2[/tex] which isn't quite the same as [tex]\sqrt{x^2}[/tex]
If we're allowed to work with the complex numbers, then [itex]\sqrt{-3}=\sqrt{3}i[/itex] where [itex]i=\sqrt{-1},i^2=-1[/itex] which is imaginary. In thise case, if we computed [tex](\sqrt{-3})^2[/tex] we would end up with -3 because [itex](\sqrt{3}i)^2=(\sqrt{3})^2i^2=3(-1)=-3[/itex]

The reason your calculator gave a math error is because it can't work in the complex plane. Most handheld calculators have been designed that way.
 


Mentallic said:
The definition of sqrt(x) is taking the principal root of x, which is just the positive value. It's different to solving the equation y2=x for y, because in that case we get [itex]y=\pm\sqrt{x}[/itex] which is both the positive and negative of sqrt(x).
So what this means is that if we take some number, then we square it, we've lost some information about the number - mainly whether it was positive or negative to begin with. For this reason, if we consider [itex]\sqrt{x^2}[/itex] since we need to square x first, then we take the square root again, we don't end up back at x exactly, unless x was positive. If x was negative then we've lost that information and that's why the answer is |x|.
ok i understand the information lost thing...its a nice way of thinking of square roots.
the problem is that we again ended up with |x| which again will always be positive. so again if before squaring x was a negative no. then that information is lost.

is it necessary to do the whole iota procedure for the second part of my question? why don't we simply cancel out the square and square root?
 


khurram usman said:
the problem is that we again ended up with |x| which again will always be positive. so again if before squaring x was a negative no. then that information is lost.
Exactly

khurram usman said:
is it necessary to do the whole iota procedure for the second part of my question? why don't we simply cancel out the square and square root?
Ofcourse. I was just showing you that it works when dealing with complex numbers in the same way.
 


Mentallic said:
Exactly


Ofcourse. I was just showing you that it works when dealing with complex numbers in the same way.

thanku very much...understood!
by the way i have sent you a friend request...actually i am starting my calculus in college...so i will be needing help a lot and you explain very well
so do accept the request and once again thanks
 


Sure, but trust me that there are many other helpers on this forum that are very clear with their explanations as well :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K