Understanding the Singlet State of Cooper Pairs in Conventional Superconductors

.J.
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Can anyone help me, I am some what unclear on the reason why "conventional" superconductors have cooper pairs only in the singlet state. Is it something to do with the expectation values given for the separate states calculated from their spatial and spin wave functions? For example does the singlet state with an even spatial wave function and an odd spin wave function give a lower Energy eigenvalue when operated on using the Hamiltonian compared to the triplet (spin anti parallel) state?

Does BCS theory only predict singlet cooper pairs or just state that it is the more favorable ?

I know that cooper pairs have a zero center of mass momentum and anti parallel spins. Is the the anti parallel spin due to the Pauli principle (would that matter as the cooper pair is essentially a composite boson?) or due to a lower expectation value given by the Hamiltonian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I might be wrong here, but I don't think there is a "general" reason. You canuse whatever symmetry you want in the BCS theory, it just happens to be that s-wave is the most common type in conventional superconductors, but this is presumably due to the materials themselves and not due to the theory as such.
Note that for example P-wave superconductors etc are -usually- referred to as conventional and are described by the BCS theory.
 
Surely if the majority of superconductors only have a singlet amplitude, it must be in general more favorable to have a singlet state rather than a spin anti parallel or spin parallel triplet.
 
.J. said:
Surely if the majority of superconductors only have a singlet amplitude, it must be in general more favorable to have a singlet state rather than a spin anti parallel or spin parallel triplet.

But in the ruthenates, it is NOT favorable to have a single state!

Again, a lot of factors influence the ground state symmetry. So it depends on what you mean by "favorable". It is more favorable to have more Type II superconductors?

Zz.
 
Is there a dominant factor that influences the singlet state in most superconductors?
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top