Understanding the Spin States of Vector Mesons

dwight ang
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi All
Thanks for welcoming me to the physics forum. I am reading Greiner and Mueller's Quantum Mechanics: Symmetries and am stuck at not understanding the vector meson ( rho meson)'s spin states.
For S=1 we get three states -1, 0, and 1.
Prof. Mueller separated them as a rho +/-1, and rho 0 .
for the rho +/-1 he mentions the state u ( spin up , spin down) *d_ (read "d bar" for anti d) ( spin up , spin down)
How did he get to this? I did the Clebsch Gordan analysis and got lost . Need some help here.
Thanks
Dwight
 
You must be careful to distinguish spin and isospin properly. The ##\rho## meson has spin 1 and isospin 1, i.e., there are three spin states for each charge state, i.e., all together you have 9 physical field-degrees of freedom. In the SU(2) model (only up and down quarks) the electric charge is given by the eigen vectors of ##\hat{\tau}_3##, which are ##t_3 \in \{-1,0,1 \}##.

Sometimes it's more convenient to work in the SO(3) representation of the isospin. Then you have three real vector fields, written as ##\vec{\rho}^{\mu}##. You can easily convert from one to the other isospin basis:
$$\rho^{(\pm) \mu}=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} (\rho_1^{\mu} \pm \mathrm{i} \rho_2^{\mu}), \quad \rho^{(0) \mu}=\rho_3.$$

In terms of quark currents the ##\rho## mesons are built from the vector-isovector currents
$$\vec{j}^{\mu}=\overline{\psi} \vec{\tau} \gamma^{\mu} \psi,$$
where ##\psi## is the isospin doublet
$$\psi=\begin{pmatrix} u \\ d \end{pmatrix}$$
and the ##\vec{\tau}## are represented by ##\vec{\tau}=\vec{\sigma}/2##, where ##\vec{\sigma}## are the usual Pauli matrices.

By identifying the ##\vec{\rho}## with these currents, you can easily read off the quark content of the ##\rho## mesons. Of course the ##\rho^{+}## is a ##u \bar{d}##, the ##\rho^{-}## a ##d \bar{u}##, and the ##\rho_0## is given by ##\rho_3 \sim |u \bar{u} \rangle - |d \bar{d} \rangle##, because ##\tau_3=\mathrm{diag}(1,-1)##.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top