Understanding the strain energy function invariant term

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on understanding the strain energy function invariant terms, particularly the definitions and implications of the invariants I1 and I4 derived from Green's strain tensor. Participants clarify that I4 involves unit vectors corresponding to principal stretches, and the stretch ratios (lambda) represent normal stretches. There is a debate about whether the components N1, N2, and N3 are constant or variable, with the consensus that they are unit vectors whose direction can change. The conversation also touches on the distinction between left and right stretch tensors, indicating a need for further resources to clarify these concepts. Overall, the thread emphasizes the complexity of strain energy functions in large deformation contexts.
fruitkiwi
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hi, Dear all,

Facing problem to understand strain energy function invariant terms
A typical strain energy function consist of strain invariant can be defined as followed
W(I1,I4)=C0+C1(I1-3)(I4-1)+C2(I1-3)^2+C3(I1-4)^2+C4(I1-3)+C5(I4-1),
I1 and I4 are so called invariants of Green's strain tensor. (large deformation)
I1=trC=λ1^2+λ2^2+λ3^2
I4=N1*λ1^2*N1+N2*λ2^2*N2+N3*λ3^2*N3.

here is the complete link taken http://www.engin.umich.edu/class/bme456/ch6fitelasticmodelconstant/bme456fitmodel.htm

1. I read from article that N is a unit vector along the stretch direction, so can i conclude that
I4 consist of unit vector multiply with principal stretch?

2. the lamda in the formula is stretch ratio or principal stretch?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
After giving it a quick read,

2)\lambda_1 ,\lambda_2 ,\lambda_3 are the "normal stretch", where the link calls them that. but I think they are just the stretch coefficients for force in the same direction as the normal plane vector.

1) Yes, It seems so then, assuming you have "principle"\iff"normal"

That's my take on it.
 
jfy4 said:
After giving it a quick read,

2)\lambda_1 ,\lambda_2 ,\lambda_3 are the "normal stretch", where the link calls them that. but I think they are just the stretch coefficients for force in the same direction as the normal plane vector.

1) Yes, It seems so then, assuming you have "principle"\iff"normal"

That's my take on it.

Hi, jfy4,

I actually try to read more, but cannot find resources.
1. so all the N1, N2, N3,should always equal to 1? or under any condition they will change?
2. or can I call them as right stretch tensor?sorry, as i cannot differentiate left and right stretch tensor, so cannot evaluate more for you.
 
well, N_i is a unit vector, a vector whose magnitude is 1. That is N_i N_i=N_{1}^{2}+N_{2}^{2}+N_{3}^{2}=1. But, it is a vector, not a constant, so it's direction can vary. It says:
where N_i are the components of the unit vector aligned along the local muscle fiber direction.
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top