Understanding the Time Offset in EM Plane Waves

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxsthekat
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Plane Wave
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

This discussion revolves around the properties of electromagnetic (EM) waves, specifically focusing on the mathematical representation of the electric and magnetic fields. The original poster questions the significance of the minus sign in the time-dependent term of the wave equations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the minus sign in the wave equations, discussing how it relates to the direction of wave propagation. Questions arise regarding the relationship between the spatial and temporal components of the wave function.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the directional implications of the wave equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the interpretation of the minus sign, but further clarification is sought by the original poster and others.

Contextual Notes

Participants are examining foundational concepts in wave mechanics, with some expressing uncertainty about the relationship between the mathematical representation and physical interpretation. The discussion may be influenced by varying levels of familiarity with wave behavior and mathematical functions.

maxsthekat
Messages
55
Reaction score
0
This isn't a homework question so much as a general question about the equation I see used in the textbook:

The E field of an EM wave is defined as E(x, y, z, t) = E0sin(kx - wt)y_hat and the B field of an EM wave is defined as B(x, y, z, t) = B0sin(kx - wt)z_hat.

Why is there a minus sign in front of the wt term? I understand how kx (the offset in space) is positive; why wouldn't the time offset (wt) also be positive in this equation?

Thanks!

-Max
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The minus sign just means the wave is traveling in the +x direction.

You could have it be +wt. In that case the wave travels in the -x direction.
 
I see... But, why is a +x direction a -wt term?
 
At t = 0
. f(k). .........

At t = t
..... f(k-wt) .....

Where f(k) is a pulse

see f(x-5) goes towards positive side and f (x+5) is at negative side or you can use the word "shift". This can understood good if you use one simple pulse rather than a complex sinusoidal function
 
maxsthekat said:
I see... But, why is a +x direction a -wt term?

Hmmm. Well, let me ask a somewhat more basic question. Do you understand why a graph of the function f(x-1) would look the same as f(x), except that it would be shifted by 1 unit in the +x direction?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K