A Understanding the Use of Grassman Numbers in Fermionic Fields: A QFT Guide

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter bengeof
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers
bengeof
My background is QM as done in Griffiths( So yes I have a background of operators, observables and scattering matrix), Classical fields as done in Goldstein and Particle physics as in Griffiths. Griffiths actually works out Feynman rules for QED and QCD. I've started QFT with Peskin and Schroeder and Zee's QFT in a nutshell. I need help in understanding the use of Grassman numbers in fermionic fields
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is your question?
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby
What is grassman numbers? I didn't understand the wiki article on it. . and how is it used in the quantization of fermionic fields ?

Thanks
 
bengeof said:
What is grassman numbers? I didn't understand the wiki article on it. . and how is it used in the quantization of fermionic fields ?

Thanks
This is far too general for us to be of much use without writing a textbook style introduction. You say you have read the Wiki page, exactly what about them did you run into problems with?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and PeterDonis
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top