Understanding the Work-Energy Theorem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies key definitions related to the Work-Energy Theorem. Work is defined as energy transferred when forces between two objects interact. The formula for work done by a force is established as W = F*Δs, indicating that work equals force multiplied by the distance moved in the direction of the force. Additionally, work done by a gas is defined as W = p*ΔV, where pressure is multiplied by the change in volume. Overall, the conversation reinforces the foundational concepts of work in physics.
Daniel2244
Messages
125
Reaction score
5
Are the following definitions correct?

  • Work done as energy transferred
The energy transferred when the forces between two objects interact

  • Work done by a force
Work done = force x distance moved in the direction of force applied (W=F*Δs)

  • Work done by a gas
Work done = pressure x change in volume of gas (W=p*ΔV)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you just... I mean, you answered the 2nd and the 3rd question yourself.
 
When a force is applied to a body and the body is displaced from its original position then work is done.

Work-Energy-Theorem.png

if you like to know about Work-Energy Theorem.
here are full details of Work-Energy Theorem
 

Attachments

  • Work-Energy-Theorem.png
    Work-Energy-Theorem.png
    755 bytes · Views: 441
  • Like
Likes Daniel2244

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »

Thread 'Free fall of person in a sled to direct horizontal motion by atmospheric resistance'

Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
View full post »

Similar threads

B About verification on Kinetic energy and work
Replies
16
Views
2K
B Work done in lifting and lowering an object
Replies
34
Views
4K
I Why does the main muscle use the most energy in body movements?
Replies
24
Views
2K
Unraveling the Mystery of Work Done & Energy Transfer
Replies
20
Views
2K
Work done by a constant Force: questions
Replies
3
Views
1K
Why the work done is coming out to be positive?
Replies
9
Views
1K
I Work-Energy Theorem for Moving Block and Spring System?
Replies
4
Views
2K
B Work energy theorem by variable force
Replies
23
Views
2K
Use internal pressure to compute work done by an expanding gas?
Replies
15
Views
3K
I Work Done/Energy Transferred in One Dimensional Collision
Replies
5
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top