Understanding Transient Analysis and the Role of Velocity's Direction

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Mikealvarado100
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Water
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around transient analysis in fluid dynamics, particularly focusing on the role of velocity's direction and magnitude in phenomena such as water hammer. Participants explore the implications of changing velocity direction versus changing velocity magnitude in the context of momentum and transient forces within a piping system.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that transient analysis is often discussed in terms of changes in the amount of velocity, but questions whether changes in velocity's direction also contribute to transients.
  • Another participant argues that changing direction is equivalent to changing the amount when considering velocity as a vector, particularly in one-dimensional flow scenarios.
  • A participant clarifies that while changing direction does involve acceleration, it does not necessarily lead to transient forces like water hammer unless there is a change in flow conditions, such as turning the flow on or off.
  • One participant challenges the notion that changing direction alone can cause water hammer, suggesting that it is the change in velocity that matters, referencing Jakowski's equation to support their view.
  • Another participant acknowledges a previous error in stating that water hammer only occurs when flow is turned on or off, agreeing that it is related to changes in velocity.
  • A participant provides an example involving a moving train and a vertical water pipe to illustrate that water hammer can occur without a complete reversal of flow direction, emphasizing the abrupt change in force when the valve is closed.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between changes in velocity direction and the occurrence of water hammer. There is no consensus on whether changing direction alone can generate transient forces, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the conditions under which water hammer occurs.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and concepts, such as Jakowski's equation, but there are unresolved assumptions about the definitions and implications of velocity changes in the context of transient analysis.

Mikealvarado100
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
Hi
Transient is result of changing in momentum and momentum is result of changing in velocity. Velocity is a vector parameter. It means that Velocity's change is due to changing in velocity's quantity or velocity's direction. All discussions about transient Analysis speak about Transient as result of changing in AMOUNT of velocity not changing in DIRECTION of it.
Assume a pipe with no operations or branches, valves or ... but there is a Tee along the pipe. Changing in velocity's direction makes momentum and therefore it makes a transient. Am I right or I make mistake and Transient is due to JUST velocity's quantity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Changing a direction is the same as changing an amount if you work in vectors. For piping it is easy since the flow is 1-dimensional: a change in direction changes the velocity from x to -x; a change in speed of 2x.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mheslep
Mike.. You are correct.

You have acceleration if either the magnitude or direction component of velocity changes.

However your question is about water hammer... let's say you have a pipe with a 90 degree bend in it. As water flows around the bend it accelerates (because the direction changes). This does not cause a transient force (hammer) because the water is constantly flowing. A constant acceleration means a constant force. You only get a transient force when the water is turned on or off.
 
Last edited:
russ_watters & CWatters
Hi
I believe that changing direction of velocity (with constant amount) DOS NOT generate Water Hammer (and it produces Force only), but not because of what you (CWatters) believe. You say Hammer will be generated if velocity becomes to zero or becomes more that zero (from zero). It is not right. Hammer occurs if velocity CHANGES (not just becomes zero). My justification is according to Jakowski's equation [dH= (a/g)dv]. In this equation dh is not vector, and dv can not be vector. because if dv be vector, then dH becomes vector.
But I am not sure about my reason.
Do you have another idea?
Thank you.
 
Mikealvarado100 said:
You say Hammer will be generated if velocity becomes to zero or becomes more that zero (from zero). It is not right. Hammer occurs if velocity CHANGES (not just becomes zero).

I agree. I was wrong to say it only occurs when the water is turned on or off.
 
Mikealvarado100 said:
I believe that changing direction of velocity (with constant amount) DOS NOT generate Water Hammer (and it produces Force only).
The term "hammer" indicates a very high momentary force and a corresponding abrupt change in velocity of an entire flow. A flow that moves continuously around an elbow results in no such momentary force.

We can, however, have a water hammer even without a 180 degree flow reversal. Consider a vertical water pipe on a moving train. The train is moving at 10 meters per second forward along the track. Water is flowing at 10 meters per second down the pipe and out from a valve at the bottom. From the point of view of a ground observer, the water movement is at a 45 degree angle down and forward. If the valve is closed there is an abrupt upward force. The entire flow stops moving vertically and is now moving at a 0 degree angle forward.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
8K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
38K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K