Understanding Universe Expansion & String Theory

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prairie
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the role of spacetime in the expansion of the universe, highlighting that spacetime itself expands and is influenced by gravity and dark energy. Gravity slows down expansion while dark energy accelerates it, with Einstein's Relativity framing gravity as a property of spacetime. In terms of string theory, participants express difficulty in conceptualizing strings as fundamental structures compared to point particles, noting that strings, as one-dimensional objects, avoid the infinities associated with zero-dimensional particles. Suggestions for readings on both topics are requested to deepen understanding. The relationship between spacetime and matter is emphasized as a complex and interdependent dynamic.
Prairie
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Regarding Universe Expansion:
Does the fabric of SpaceTime play a role in regulating the expansion of the universe? And if so does anyone have any recommendation of intermediate readings that could help me to understand this role?

Regarding String Theory:
I know I haven't read eonough on this subject but I've got a conceptual block... A string to me is a complex structure. Yet this particular structure is suppose to be a fundamental thing. To me a point is a fundamental structure. I'm just having trouble conceptualizing I suppose. Any suggested readings here would be greatly appreciated as well.
 
Space news on Phys.org
A point is a zero-dimensional object. A string is a one-dimensional object; it is one (and only one) degree of freedom.

The whole point of a string being a string rather than a point is this:

It is the zero-dimensional point particles that are causing all the infinities when reconciling GR and QM. A zero-D particle means that the "energy divided by time" transfer between particles ends up as an infinite (or undefined) number. If the fundamental object has at least one dimension, then transfer of energy (say, in a collision) is not infinite.
 
Last edited:
Welcome to Physics Forums, Prairie!
Prairie said:
Regarding Universe Expansion:
Does the fabric of SpaceTime play a role in regulating the expansion of the universe? And if so does anyone have any recommendation of intermediate readings that could help me to understand this role?
To say the least, the expansion of the universe is the expansion of spacetime (direct role). But also, the expansion of the universe is regulated by gravity (which slows down expansion) and "dark energy" (which speeds up expansion). With Einstein's Relativity, 'gravity' can be thought of as the behavior of spacetime. Dark energy is still a mystery.

Regarding String Theory:
I know I haven't read eonough on this subject but I've got a conceptual block... A string to me is a complex structure. Yet this particular structure is suppose to be a fundamental thing. To me a point is a fundamental structure. I'm just having trouble conceptualizing I suppose. Any suggested readings here would be greatly appreciated as well.
I'm not sure I buy string theory, but first you should get rid of the image of a string that you may find around your house and try to imagine a tiny (no...even smaller) 1-D segment...perhaps like a little energy loop instead of an energy point. But isn't a string made up of points you ask? Perhaps mathematically, but how do you get any number of zero-dimensional things to add up to anything at all? Just a thought to help visualize it.
 
Thank you both for the excellent explanations. My main interest actually concerns the relationship between Spacetime and matter. How the two are so intimately dependant, yet they do funky, and violent, things to each other.

String theory is a wonderful thought exercise for me at this point. Pardon the pun. And I wish all the string theorists the best of success. But talk about going for the jugular... wow.

Thanks again you guys.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top