Understanding Vector Components: Explaining an Inclined Plane Physics Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding the decomposition of vector components in the context of an inclined plane physics problem. Participants explore the relationships between angles and the corresponding sine and cosine functions used to resolve forces acting on an object on an incline.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the correct use of sine and cosine when breaking down the gravitational force into components, suggesting a possible misunderstanding of their association with the x and y axes.
  • Another participant asserts that the initial participant's understanding of sine and cosine is fundamentally incorrect and encourages them to refer to trigonometric definitions.
  • A later reply clarifies that the association of sine and cosine depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or the y-axis, indicating that the initial confusion may stem from this distinction.
  • One participant proposes a method to avoid confusion by always using standard angle measurement, where the positive x-axis is defined as 0 degrees, ensuring consistent associations of cosine with x and sine with y.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the initial misunderstanding of vector components, but there is agreement on the importance of angle measurement in determining the correct use of sine and cosine. The discussion reflects differing viewpoints on how to approach the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved assumptions regarding the definitions of angles and the context in which sine and cosine are applied, which may affect the clarity of the discussion.

micaele
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
So I was watching some of those physics videos posted in schoolwork board, and although he probably didn't make an error here, I don't think I understand it.

Here's the pictues. I'll elaborate after it so you guys know what I'm talking about:

http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/6632/88907417sb7.png When he broke the downward mg force into its components (mg cos theta = ma sub x and mg sin theta = ma sub y), shouldn't it be mg sin theta instead, and likewise for the other? I thought that when you break a vector into its parts, sine is associated with the y-axis and cosine for the x.

Maybe I'm having a brain fart, but I swear I had those vector components figured out.

Thanks ahead of time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Draw a picture and work out the geometery. Your understanding of sin and cos is fundamentally wrong.

see "Right triangle definitions"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_function

Hopefully, you can work that out for yourself given the link.
 
micaele said:
I thought that when you break a vector into its parts, sine is associated with the y-axis and cosine for the x.

It depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or from the y-axis. If the angle is measured from the x-axis, what you wrote is correct. If the angle is measured from the y-axis, it's the other way around.
 
jtbell said:
It depends on whether the angle is measured from the x-axis or from the y-axis. If the angle is measured from the x-axis, what you wrote is correct. If the angle is measured from the y-axis, it's the other way around.

THAT'S the reason!

Thank you, that completely did not occur to me. I understand now, thanks.
 
One of the easiest (not fastest) ways to avoid this difficulty is to always use standard angle measurement (where the + x-axis is 0). Then x is always associated with cos and y is always associated with sin and the +s and -s take care of themselves.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K