Understanding Vector Spaces: Axioms and Operations

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the understanding of vector spaces and their axioms, specifically addressing the properties of addition and scalar multiplication. Participants clarify that the objects u, v, and w can be represented as ordered pairs, and they explore the implications of the axioms on these pairs. Initial confusion arises regarding the validity of certain axioms, particularly Axiom 4 and Axiom 5, but further analysis reveals that both can hold true in the given context. The conversation emphasizes the importance of verifying each axiom to confirm whether a set qualifies as a vector space. Ultimately, the participants conclude that their approach is correct, leading to a deeper understanding of vector space properties.
dcramps
Messages
43
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


aedE9.png

Homework Equations


The 10 axioms:
1. If u and v are objects in V, then u + v is in V
2. u + v = v + u
3. u + (v+w) = (u+v)+w
4. There is an object 0 in V, called a zero factor for V, such that 0+u = u+0 = u for all u in V
5. For each u in V, there is an object -u in V, called a negative of u, such that u+(-u)=(-u)+u = 0
6. If k is any scalar and u is any object in V, then ku is in V
7. k(u + v) = ku + kv
8. (k + m)u = ku + mu
9. k(mu) = (km)(u)
10. 1u = u

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, are u, v, and w just (x_{1},y_{1}), (x_{2},y_{2}), (x_{3},y_{3}) and so on? If so, am I going about this the right way?

Axiom 1. Since x,y\inR, then any (x,y)\in thus the addition would hold. (Not really sure how to explain this one well)
Axiom 2. (x_{1},y_{1})+(x_{2},y_{2}) = (x_{1}+x_{2}+_{1},y_{1}+y_{2}+_{1}) = (x_{2},y_{2})+(x_{1},y_{1}) = (x_{2}+x_{1}+_{1},y_{2}+y_{1}+_{1})
Axiom 3.
u=(x_{1},y_{1})
v=(x_{2},y_{2})
w=(x_{3},y_{3})

u+(v+w) = (x_{1},y_{1})+(x_{2}+x_{3}+1,y_{2}+y_{3}+1) = (x_{1}+(x_{2}+x_{3}+1)+1,y_{1}+(y_{2}+y_{3}+1)+1) = (x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}+_{2},y_{1}+y_{2}+y_{3}+2)
(u+v)+w = (x_{1}+x_{2}+1,y_{1}+y_{2}+1) + (x_{3},y_{3}) = ((x_{1}+x_{2}+_{1})+x_{3}+1,(y_{1}+y_{2}+1)+y_{3}+1) = (x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}+_{2},y_{1}+y_{2}+y_{3}+2)and so on for the rest...

Is this the correct approach? It seems that it is to me, but I may be way off here.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dcramps said:

Homework Statement


aedE9.png

Homework Equations


The 10 axioms:
1. If u and v are objects in V, then u + v is in V
2. u + v = v + u
3. u + (v+w) = (u+v)+w
4. There is an object 0 in V, called a zero factor for V, such that 0+u = u+0 = u for all u in V
That would be zero vector, not factor.
dcramps said:
5. For each u in V, there is an object -u in V, called a negative of u, such that u+(-u)=(-u)+u = 0
6. If k is any scalar and u is any object in V, then ku is in V
7. k(u + v) = ku + kv
8. (k + m)u = ku + mu
9. k(mu) = (km)(u)
10. 1u = u

The Attempt at a Solution


First of all, are u, v, and w just (x_{1},y_{1}), (x_{2},y_{2}), (x_{3},y_{3}) and so on? If so, am I going about this the right way?
Yes, u, v, and w and just ordered pairs.
dcramps said:
Axiom 1. Since x,y\inR, then any (x,y)\in thus the addition would hold.
You left something out. ... then any (x, y) \in V, so V is closed under addition.
dcramps said:
(Not really sure how to explain this one well)
Axiom 2. (x_{1},y_{1})+(x_{2},y_{2}) = (x_{1}+x_{2}+_{1},y_{1}+y_{2}+_{1}) = (x_{2},y_{2})+(x_{1},y_{1}) = (x_{2}+x_{1}+_{1},y_{2}+y_{1}+_{1})
Axiom 3.
u=(x_{1},y_{1})
v=(x_{2},y_{2})
w=(x_{3},y_{3})

u+(v+w) = (x_{1},y_{1})+(x_{2}+x_{3}+1,y_{2}+y_{3}+1) = (x_{1}+(x_{2}+x_{3}+1)+1,y_{1}+(y_{2}+y_{3}+1)+1) = (x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}+_{2},y_{1}+y_{2}+y_{3}+2)
(u+v)+w = (x_{1}+x_{2}+1,y_{1}+y_{2}+1) + (x_{3},y_{3}) = ((x_{1}+x_{2}+_{1})+x_{3}+1,(y_{1}+y_{2}+1)+y_{3}+1) = (x_{1}+x_{2}+x_{3}+_{2},y_{1}+y_{2}+y_{3}+2)


and so on for the rest...

Is this the correct approach? It seems that it is to me, but I may be way off here.
Yes, this is the right approach. I have my suspicions, though, that V is not a vector space.
 
Thanks for the tip and clarification :]

I think you are correct, unless I made a mistake. Using this approach I found that all axioms were satisfied except axiom 5. Thoughts on this?
 
Axiom 4 is also violated. There might be others, but I didn't check all of them.
 
dcramps said:
Thanks for the tip and clarification :]

I think you are correct, unless I made a mistake. Using this approach I found that all axioms were satisfied except axiom 5. Thoughts on this?

Mark44 said:
Axiom 4 is also violated. There might be others, but I didn't check all of them.
Both axioms hold, actually. The zero vector would be 0=(-1,-1), and the additive inverse would be -(x,y) = (-x-2,-y-2). I would have thought one of axioms 7-10 would fail, but I think they all work out.
 
Live and learn. Thanks, Vela.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top