Understanding Wave Dispersion & Group Velocity: Help Needed!

AI Thread Summary
Group velocity refers to the speed at which energy is transmitted through a group of waves. Dispersion in a medium occurs when the phase velocity of waves varies with frequency, affecting how different frequencies travel through the medium. A wave group, wave train, wave packet, and pulse are often used interchangeably, but they can have specific distinctions in certain contexts. Dispersive media respond to the frequency of waves, while non-dispersive media do not, leading to different propagation behaviors. The energy transfer in waves is associated with the effective wavefront, which moves at the group velocity.
samreen
Messages
24
Reaction score
0
*for a group of waves, the energy is transmitted with the group velocity.
what does that mean?

*what is meant, as in actually meant, by dispersion of a wave in a medium? whatever i looked up says phase velocity depends on frequency for a dispersive medium and vice versa. Why?

* wave group=wave train of finite length=wave packet=pulse ? correct the wrong bits in this statement please

i need lots of help because I am in a soup here :(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
i think I've got it somewhat. a dispersive medium is one that can sense the discreteness of a complex wave. because frequency is an issue for it. whereas a non dispersive medium is too stupid to. for it, there effectively is just that fancy wave propagating thru it. and it isn't much bothered by the frequency. not an issue. unlike a dispersive medium, which reacts somehow to frquency, because the phase velocity is diff for diff frequencies.

and for any wave, the effective energy transfer may be assumed to be happening via the effective wavefront, which propagates with the effective velocity or group velocity. right so far??
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
803
Replies
5
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top