Understanding Weinberg's Symmetries and Rays

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter emma83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rays Symmetries
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 6K views
emma83
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am reading Weinberg's book and in the part on symmetries he speaks about rays, and says basically that 2 vectors [tex]U,V[/tex] which are on the same ray can only differ by a phase factor [tex]\phi[/tex], so that [tex]U=e^{i\phi}V[/tex].

Is "ray" meaning "direction" here ? Can I rephrase it and say that 2 colinear vectors can only differ by a phase factor ?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
emma83 said:
Is "ray" meaning "direction" here ? Can I rephrase it and say that 2 colinear vectors can only differ by a phase factor ?

Hi emma! :smile:

From pp. 49-50:
A ray is a set of normalised vectors with Ψ and Ψ' belonging to the same ray if Ψ' = ξΨ, where ξ is an arbitrary complex number with |ξ| = 1

So a ray is an equivalence class of normalised vectors in Hilbert space …

two normalised vectors "are" the same ray if they only differ by a phase factor. :smile:

(but i don't think thinking in terms of "directions" is helpful, when these things are more like functions :wink:)
 
Thank your very much!

Ok, now I think I also understand why he infers [tex]e^{i\phi}[/tex] as proportional factor (and not just e.g. a [tex]k \in \mathbb{C}[/tex]) between the 2 vectors: because it is the most general complex proportional factor which is normalized to 1...