Understanding Weinberg's Symmetries and Rays

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter emma83
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rays Symmetries
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion clarifies the concept of "rays" as presented in Steven Weinberg's book on quantum mechanics. Specifically, it establishes that two normalized vectors U and V belong to the same ray if they differ only by a phase factor, expressed mathematically as U = e^{i\phi}V. The term "ray" is defined as an equivalence class of normalized vectors in Hilbert space, where the phase factor is represented by an arbitrary complex number with a modulus of one. The discussion emphasizes that interpreting rays in terms of "directions" is less beneficial than understanding them as functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hilbert space concepts
  • Familiarity with normalized vectors
  • Basic knowledge of complex numbers and their properties
  • Awareness of quantum mechanics terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of normalized vectors in Hilbert space
  • Explore the implications of phase factors in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about equivalence classes in mathematical contexts
  • Investigate the role of complex numbers in quantum state representation
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists, and mathematicians interested in the foundational aspects of quantum theory and the mathematical structures underlying it.

emma83
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I am reading Weinberg's book and in the part on symmetries he speaks about rays, and says basically that 2 vectors [tex]U,V[/tex] which are on the same ray can only differ by a phase factor [tex]\phi[/tex], so that [tex]U=e^{i\phi}V[/tex].

Is "ray" meaning "direction" here ? Can I rephrase it and say that 2 colinear vectors can only differ by a phase factor ?

Thanks for your help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
emma83 said:
Is "ray" meaning "direction" here ? Can I rephrase it and say that 2 colinear vectors can only differ by a phase factor ?

Hi emma! :smile:

From pp. 49-50:
A ray is a set of normalised vectors with Ψ and Ψ' belonging to the same ray if Ψ' = ξΨ, where ξ is an arbitrary complex number with |ξ| = 1

So a ray is an equivalence class of normalised vectors in Hilbert space …

two normalised vectors "are" the same ray if they only differ by a phase factor. :smile:

(but i don't think thinking in terms of "directions" is helpful, when these things are more like functions :wink:)
 
Thank your very much!

Ok, now I think I also understand why he infers [tex]e^{i\phi}[/tex] as proportional factor (and not just e.g. a [tex]k \in \mathbb{C}[/tex]) between the 2 vectors: because it is the most general complex proportional factor which is normalized to 1...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
607
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K