Lorentz Symmetry at Black Hole Event Horizon

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of Lorentz symmetry in the context of General Relativity (GR) as one approaches a black hole, particularly focusing on whether Lorentz symmetry is maintained or broken at the event horizon.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that Lorentz symmetry becomes local in GR, implying that it holds only in small regions of spacetime without mass/energy.
  • Another participant clarifies that Lorentz symmetry is a property of the tangent space at each point, not a global symmetry of spacetime.
  • It is noted that even in vacuum solutions like Schwarzschild spacetime, the metric is not Minkowski anywhere, indicating curvature persists.
  • A participant argues that as one approaches a black hole, the area where local Lorentz symmetry holds may decrease due to increasing tidal forces, but this does not alter the Lorentz symmetry at a point.
  • Another participant adds that for sufficiently large black holes, one can cross the event horizon without feeling any ill effects due to locally flat spacetime, although they acknowledge the eventual singularity poses challenges.
  • A later reply expresses understanding of the clarification regarding local symmetry and its relation to the equivalence principle.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit disagreement regarding the implications of local Lorentz symmetry as one approaches a black hole, particularly whether it is broken at the event horizon. There is no consensus on this matter.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the nuances of local versus global properties of spacetime and the implications of tidal forces, but the discussion does not resolve the complexities surrounding these concepts.

Milsomonk
Messages
100
Reaction score
17
Hello people,
I have been thinking about a concept that I was taught whilst learning GR, If I understand correctly it is that Lorentz symmetry becomes local when we consider GR. This makes sense to me as then the metric is generally speaking not Minkowski, only for a sufficiently small area with no mass/energy present.

So my question is this, as you approach a black hole is it correct to say that the local area in which lorentz symmetry holds gets smaller?

If so can it then be inferred that the symmetry is broken at event horizon?

Thanks in advance for your time :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Milsomonk said:
If I understand correctly it is that Lorentz symmetry becomes local when we consider GR.

This is true, but you have to be clear about what that means. It means that Lorentz symmetry is not a symmetry of spacetime at all. It's a symmetry of the tangent space at each point.

Milsomonk said:
This makes sense to me as then the metric is generally speaking not Minkowski, only for a sufficiently small area with no mass/energy present.

Even if there is no stress-energy present, the metric will not be Minkowski in general. For example, Schwarzschild spacetime is a vacuum solution, but the metric is not Minkowski anywhere; it's curved everywhere.

Milsomonk said:
as you approach a black hole is it correct to say that the local area in which lorentz symmetry holds gets smaller?

You are confusing local Lorentz symmetry with the equivalence principle. In general, as tidal gravity increases (which it will as you get closer to any gravitating body, black hole or otherwise), given a fixed measurement accuracy, the area over which tidal effects will be negligible gets smaller. But that only tells you the area over which you can approximate the actual curved spacetime with a small patch of flat spacetime. It doesn't change anything about the Lorentz symmetry of the tangent space at a point.

Milsomonk said:
If so can it then be inferred that the symmetry is broken at event horizon?

No. See above.
 
Just to add to what PeterDonis says - given a large enough black hole, GR predicts that you can cross the event horizon with no ill effect. Spacetime is still locally flat enough that you won't feel a thing. You can't escape, and you'll be shredded before you reach the singularity. But it's locally flat spacetime all the way in - for increasingly local meanings of local and give or take the eventual inaccuracy of GR near the predicted singularity.
 
I understand, thanks for the clarification, I was thinking it would be local for a patch in the same sense you consider the equivalence principle, cheers guys :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
6K
  • · Replies 73 ·
3
Replies
73
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
4K