Understanding WKB Approximation for E-V(x)

curious.cat
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Consider E>V(x). WKB states the wavefunction will remain sinusoidal with a slow variation of wavelength $ \lambda $ and amplitude given that V(x) varies slowly. From the equation \begin{equation}
k(x)=\frac{\sqrt{2m(E-V(x))}}{\hbar}
\end{equation}, I can see that the k(x) is directly proportional to E-V(x), implying that $ \lambda $ is inversely proportional to E-V(x). I cannot understand why the amplitude should change with a variation in V(x). I do know that if E-V(x) becomes negative then the wavefunction becomes exponentially decaying in which case the wavefunction is no longer a periodic function (hence, amplitudes and wavelengths no longer apply). What is the equation connecting amplitude with V(x)? I am stuck and unable to proceed any further. Sorry about the equation numbering. I am rather new to LATEX
 
Physics news on Phys.org
k(x) is only the first term in an expansion of the wavefunction into orders of ##\hbar##, the next order therm, called the eikonal, gives you the variation of the amplitude.
It should be obvious why the amplitude changes with k: ##p=\hbar k## is momentum and proportional to v. Already classically, the probability to find, say, a planet at a given point of its orbit when averaging over time is inversely proportional to v. But the amplitude of the wavefunction is the square root of this probability. Everything you ever want to know about the WKB approximation can be found in the review by Berry and Mount: http://iopscience.iop.org/article/1...678CE73A943EED846ECCF5898519449.ip-10-40-1-74
 
  • Like
Likes curious.cat
Thank you!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
I am not sure if this belongs in the biology section, but it appears more of a quantum physics question. Mike Wiest, Associate Professor of Neuroscience at Wellesley College in the US. In 2024 he published the results of an experiment on anaesthesia which purported to point to a role of quantum processes in consciousness; here is a popular exposition: https://neurosciencenews.com/quantum-process-consciousness-27624/ As my expertise in neuroscience doesn't reach up to an ant's ear...
I am reading WHAT IS A QUANTUM FIELD THEORY?" A First Introduction for Mathematicians. The author states (2.4 Finite versus Continuous Models) that the use of continuity causes the infinities in QFT: 'Mathematicians are trained to think of physical space as R3. But our continuous model of physical space as R3 is of course an idealization, both at the scale of the very large and at the scale of the very small. This idealization has proved to be very powerful, but in the case of Quantum...
Back
Top