Understanding Zeroth Order Approximations in Landau Level Equations

  • Thread starter Thread starter bobydbcn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Landau
bobydbcn
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
The hamiltonian is H=\frac{1}{2}(\vec{p}+\frac{\vec{A}}{c}). We investigate this problem at a polar coordinate (r,\theta). The radial equation is
[-\frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2}{dr^2}+\frac{1}{2}(m^2-\frac{1}{4})\frac{1}{r^2}+\frac{1}{2}\omega_{L}r^2]u(r)=[E-m\omega_{L}]u(r)
in order to find the wavefunction, we must investigate the behavior at the infinity of the differential euqtion.my question is that why the approximate equation take this form at infinity.r\rightarrow\infty, the equation becomes
[-\frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2}{dr^2}+\frac{1}{2}\omega_{L}r^2]u(r)=0.
by the way, the energy is E=\omega_L(2n+|m|+m+1). we can see that when r\rightarrow\infty, then n\rightarrow\infty, so the energy above becomes infinity. then we can't omit [E-m\omega_{L}]u(r) in the above approximate equation. In my opinion, the equation should be written in the follow formulation:
[-\frac{1}{2}\frac{d^2}{dr^2}+\frac{1}{2}\omega_{L}r^2]u(r)=[E-m\omega_{L}]u(r)
Is that right? What is the reason?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The right hand side of your equation becomes negligible compared to the second term on the left hand side so you drop it a a zeroth order approximation. The second derivative is the only term which can compensate the second term, hence you keep it.
 
DrDu said:
The right hand side of your equation becomes negligible compared to the second term on the left hand side so you drop it a a zeroth order approximation. The second derivative is the only term which can compensate the second term, hence you keep it.

Thank you very much. I got it. Is there experiment that varify the landau level? Can you suggest a book to me about the zeroth order approximation?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top