Uniform Circular Motion extended response

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a homework assignment on uniform circular motion, focusing on centripetal acceleration and its properties. The student seeks feedback on their understanding and communication skills, as the teacher did not collect the assignment. Responses indicate that the student's explanation of basic concepts is clear, but there is potential to explore more advanced topics in circular motion. The student expresses interest in furthering their knowledge, particularly in mechanics, as they aspire to become an aeronautical or aerospace engineer. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of foundational understanding while encouraging exploration of more complex physics concepts.
NickSpain96
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
This began as homework that our Physics teacher set us. However, for some reason he decided no to collect it. I am curious as to whether or not this display my understanding of the topic well as communication is main area my teacher believes I need improvement in.

Homework Statement


Write a response of the appropriate format discussing:
- Existence and properties of centripetal acceleration
- Cause(s) of centripetal acceleration
- 4 examples of circular motion (must have 3 different forces)

Homework Equations


Δv=s/t, Δa=v/t, F=ma, a=v^2/r, F=mv^2/r

These are the only relevant equations I am aware of, however, I don't doubt there are much more and if possible please comment them

The Attempt at a Solution


Attached is my response.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi, welcome to physicsforums!
Your response looks pretty good to me. It explains the concept in a fairly clear way, and you gave some nice examples. It looks like you showed that you understand the physics pretty well. There is more (slightly more advanced physics) related to circular motion that you could have talked about. But I am guessing that this response was meant to be about the basics of circular motion, and I think you do explain that pretty well.
 
Thanks BruceW,
BruceW said:
There is more (slightly more advanced physics) related to circular motion that you could have talked about. But I am guessing that this response was meant to be about the basics of circular motionl.
Your right in saying it was the basics of circular motion as this is my first year of high school physics, however, I am curious about the more advanced side of circular motion (or any kind of mechanics in general, as I am aspiring to become an aeronautical or aerospace engineer). If you or anyone else who is reading this would be able to explain it to me, or even provide me with some resources that would be great :).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top