Uniform Continuity and Supremum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of uniform continuity and the supremum of a difference quotient for functions defined on the interval [-1, 1]. Participants are tasked with finding a function that is uniformly continuous yet has an infinite supremum for the specified difference quotient.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various functions, including x*sin(1/x) and square root functions, questioning their uniform continuity and the behavior of their derivatives. There are inquiries about the conditions under which the supremum of the difference quotient might be infinite.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes hints and suggestions for exploring functions with undefined derivatives or oscillating behavior. Some participants express uncertainty about the implications of uniform continuity and the nature of the functions being considered. There is acknowledgment of a simpler example that may meet the criteria.

Contextual Notes

There are constraints regarding the definitions of uniform continuity and differentiability, as well as the requirement for functions to be defined on the real numbers. Participants also note the importance of rigorous proof versus example generation in their discussions.

renjean
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
renjean said:

Homework Statement




Homework Equations



Give an example of a function f that is uniformly continuous on [-1,1] such that
sup{ [f(x)-f(y) / [x-y] } = infinity

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to come up with functions for hours but I am just not getting it. Any help would be appreciated.

What kinds of functions have you tried and why do you think they aren't working?
 
Hint: That's a difference quotient.
 
Further hint: find a function whose derivative is infinite/doesn't exist...
 
Does x*sin(1/x) work since its derivative is undefined at x=0 which is in [-1,1]?
 
Well,

1) is it uniform continuous??
2) Do the difference quotients go to infinity??

Just saying that the derivative is undefined isn't really enough...

PS There is a much easier example
 
I thought that any continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is also uniformly continuous. And in the case of x*sin(1/x) the derivative appears to go to infinity at x=0.
 
chairbear said:
I thought that any continuous function on a closed and bounded interval is also uniformly continuous.

Correct.

And in the case of x*sin(1/x) the derivative appears to go to infinity at x=0.

Not really. Rather, the derivative does not exist (since it oscillates too much). Nevertheless the supremum you mention does indeed go to infinity. (you might want to give a further proof if it is not clear)
 
I feel silly for making things more complicated than necessary. What was the easier example you had in mind? I was thinking square root x would work if the interval was [0,1].
 
  • #10
chairbear said:
I feel silly for making things more complicated than necessary. What was the easier example you had in mind? I was thinking square root x would work if the interval was [0,1].

Don't feel silly. Your example is very elegant.

The square root is indeed the one I had in mind. You just need to modify it a bit.
 
  • #11
So it would just be sqrt(x+1) for the [-1,1] interval as another solution?
 
  • #12
That should do it.
 
  • #13
thanks
 
Last edited:
  • #14
chairbear said:
Thank you for your help. I was wondering if you could help me to get started on another question I have.

I have to prove that for a function f with f'(0)=0, there's a sequence xn that converges to 0 for all n such that f'(xn) converges to 0. and xn can't = 0 for any n.

I'm not sure exactly how to get started on this, because I'm not sure if it's supposed to be a rigorous proof, or if I'm just supposed to come up with a sequence that satisfies the conditions for some f.

It's not even true. There are functions that differentiable at x=0, that aren't even differentiable anywhere else.
 
  • #15
Sorry, there's a condition also that f: R-->R and must be differentiable on R
 
  • #16
chairbear said:
Sorry, there's a condition also that f: R-->R and must be differentiable on R

Then maybe use the mean value theorem?
 
  • #17
Just out of curiosity, renjean and chairbear, what is the reason you deleted your questions?
 
  • #18
I like Serena said:
Just out of curiosity, renjean and chairbear, what is the reason you deleted your questions?

It's because they are cheating. Please report these kind of things.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
914
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
5K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K