Uniform linear, circular and rotational motion

AI Thread Summary
Uniform linear motion involves an object moving at a constant speed without acceleration, maintaining its speed and direction indefinitely. In uniform circular motion, an object also moves at a constant speed but requires a centripetal force directed toward the center of its circular path to maintain that motion. Without this force, the object will transition to linear motion. Rotational motion, similar to linear motion, allows an object to spin at a constant angular speed unless acted upon by angular acceleration, with tension in a rigid body providing the necessary centripetal force to maintain rotation. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing motion in physics.
cshum00
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
In uniform linear motion, an object moves at a constant speed v0. And as long as no acceleration is applied onto the object, it will continue move at the same speed and direction forever.

For uniform circular motion to happen, an object must move at a constant speed v0 with a constant perpendicular acceleration of magnitude v2/r. This perpendicular acceleration always points toward the center of circular path. However, something must continuously provide the centripetal force for the perpendicular acceleration otherwise the object will become a linear motion instead.

What about rotational motion? I know that just line linear motion, if an object is spinning at a constant angular speed w0; it will keep spinning at that constant speed forever if no angular acceleration is applied. However, centrifugal force must be present for rotational objects. How can the object provide itself centrifugal force with no external influence?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The object can certainly provide it's own centripetal force.

Think of a 1m rigid rod in space. if you push the ends in opposite directions, it will spin and keep spinning, right?

Now imagine that the very centre of the rod is gone, so it's just two 0.5m rods touching. If you push on these in just the same way as the original rod, they will just float apart, right?

The bonds in the rod provide tension, and this tension is the centripetal force that stops that ends of the rod floating apart and therefor causes them to follow rotational motion.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top