Uniformly Accelerated Motion: A Puzzling Problem?

AI Thread Summary
The problem of uniformly accelerated motion is deemed ill-posed, as multiple solutions exist for the acceleration of a particle moving from position x at time t to position y at time s. It is suggested that acceleration could be zero or any value that allows the particle to transition from rest to the final position within the given time frame. The discussion emphasizes that without an additional data point, the problem lacks determinacy. The need for more information to uniquely define the acceleration is highlighted. Overall, the problem requires clarification to arrive at a specific solution.
ilp89
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
The problem statement:

A particle travels along the x-axis with uniformly accelerated motion. At times t and s its position is x and y, respectively. Show that its acceleration is a = 2(yt-xs)/ts(s-t).

The attempt at a solution:

I could be wrong, but it seems to me this problem is ill-posed. Couldn't one solution be a = 0? Couldn't another be that acceleration which gets the particle from rest at (x,t) to (y,s)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does seem to be ill-posed; A particle can get from one point to another (from x to y) in a given time interval using any choice of initial speed and a suitable constant acceleration. Another data point of some kind would be required to make the problem determinate.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top