Uniqueness of the solution with certain boundary conditions

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the uniqueness of solutions in electrodynamics when applying Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions. It highlights that the uniqueness of solutions can depend on the specific equations being solved and the nature of the boundary conditions. Linear equations typically guarantee a unique solution under these conditions, prompting a suggestion to prove this mathematically. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the characteristics of the equations involved. The conversation ultimately seeks clarity on the mathematical foundations of these principles in electrodynamics.
M. next
Messages
380
Reaction score
0
Hey!


Speaking electrodynamics, I can't seem to get mathematically or even physically convinced that the solution with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions is UNIQUE.

Can someone explain it?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What equation are you solving? Sometimes you have uniqueness, sometimes you might not depending on the problem and the boundary conditions.
 
M. next said:
Hey!


Speaking electrodynamics, I can't seem to get mathematically or even physically convinced that the solution with Dirichlet or Neumann boundary conditions is UNIQUE.

Can someone explain it?

Thanks.
Are the equations linear? If so, are you aware that the solution has to be unique? See if you can prove this mathematically by making use of the characteristics of linear equations.

Chet
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Back
Top