Unit solid angle and finite angle

AI Thread Summary
A point source emits 0.11 lumen of luminous flux isotropically, and the task is to find the flux within a cone with a half angle of 30 degrees. The luminous flux is calculated using the formula that relates luminous flux to luminous intensity and solid angle. The solid angle of the cone is determined to be 0.84 steradians, which is less than one steradian. Consequently, the resulting flux within the cone is expected to be smaller than the total luminous flux, as it only accounts for a portion of the emitted light. This confirms that the flux within a finite solid angle can indeed be less than the luminous intensity.
lkijmj
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point source emits visible light isotropically. Its luminous flux is 0.11 lumen. Find the flux whithin the cone that has half angle of 30 degree from the light source.

Homework Equations



luminous flux = luminous intensity * solid anlge

The Attempt at a Solution


I tried to divide the flux 0.11lumen by 4pi and then multiply the solid angle. But since the solid angle of the cone is 0.84sr, the result appears to be smaller than the luminous intensity. But I don't understand the result. Can the flux of finite solid angle be smaller than luminous intensity?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Luminous flux is the total perceived power emitted in all directions (4pi steradians).
Luminous intensity is the perceived power per unit solid angle.

So you divided the given luminous flux by 4pi steradians in order to obtain the luminous intensity, and then multiplied by the given solid angle in order to find the flux within that solid angle. Looks okay to me.
 
But it doesn't make sense that luminous flux is smaller than luminous intensity. How can I explain this?
 
lkijmj said:
But it doesn't make sense that luminous flux is smaller than luminous intensity. How can I explain this?
The intensity is the perceived luminous power per unit solid angle (i.e. per steradian).

You found the solid angle of interest to be 0.842 sr. That's less than one steradian. So naturally the resulting flux will be less than the flux for a whole steradian.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top