Unit Vectors for Ellipse: How Do You Find the Tangential and Normal Vectors?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around finding the tangential and normal unit vectors for an ellipse defined by its major and minor axes. The original poster presents a problem involving the parameterization of the ellipse and the derivation of these vectors, drawing parallels to the simpler case of a circle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the parameterization of the ellipse and the derivation of the unit tangent and normal vectors. There are questions about the appropriateness of the original poster's approach and the need for clarity in defining the axes. Some participants suggest using derivatives to find the vectors, while others express concerns about the complexity of the calculations involved.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the definitions and calculations related to the tangent and normal vectors. Some guidance has been offered regarding the parameterization and the derivation process, but there is no explicit consensus on the correctness of the proposed normal vector or the definitions being used.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of specifying the directions for the major and minor axes in the problem statement. There is also mention of the distinction between outward and inward normals, which has not been clarified in the original problem.

psid
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the tangential and normal unit vectors for an ellipse with major axis of length a in the x-direction and minor axis of length b in the y-direction.

Homework Equations



For a circle, the unit vectors are defined as
[tex]\hat{r}=\cos{\theta}\hat{i}+\sin{\theta}\hat{j}[/tex]
[tex]\hat{\theta}=-\sin{\theta}\hat{i}+\cos{\theta}\hat{j}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



For the circular case the derivation is easy, one just takes the derivate of
[tex]\vec{r}=r\cos{\theta}\hat{i}+r\sin{\theta}\hat{j}[/tex]
with respect to [tex]\theta[/tex] and r. Now one can take the derivative with respect to [tex]\theta[/tex] and hope that this gives the vector I'm looking for, but I'm not sure. How about the vector normal to the tangent?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Why did you not use the appropriate form for homework problems? In particular, why have you not shown any attempt to do this yourself?

(In order that anyone be able to do this, you will need to specify the directions for the major and minor axes.)
 
First step is to parameterize the ellipse into the form [itex]\vec{r}=\vec{r}(t)=x(t)\hat{i}+y(t)\hat{j}+z(t)\hat{k}[/itex] (I used [itex]t[/itex] as the parameter, but you could just as well use [itex]\theta[/itex] or any other variable). For example, a circle in the xy-plane of radius [itex]R[/itex] centered at the origin can be parameterized as [itex]\vec{r}(t)=R\cos(t)\hat{i}+R\sin(t)\hat{j}[/itex].

Once you've parameterized your ellipse, the unit tangent [itex]\hat{T}[/itex] and unit normal [itex]\hat{N}[/itex] can be easily found by taking derivatives with respect to your chosen parameter:

[tex]\hat{T}=\frac{\vec{v}}{v}=\frac{\frac{d\vec{r}}{dt}}{\left| \frac{d\vec{r}}{dt} \right|}[/tex]

[tex]\hat{N}=\frac{\frac{d\hat{T}}{dt}}{\left| \frac{d\hat{T}}{dt} \right|}[/tex]

You should have similar definitions for these unit vectors given in whatever calculus text you are using...do you not?
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the reply. The above expression yields tangent vector rather easily:

[tex]\hat{T}=\frac{-a\sin{\theta}\hat{i}+b\cos{\theta}\hat{j}}{\sqrt{a^{2}\sin^{2}{\theta}+b^{2}\cos^{2}{\theta}}}.[/tex]

But taking the derivative of this yields multiple pages of output in Mathemathica and is not very useful.

Looking the tangent vector one can see that vector defined as

[tex]\hat{N}=\frac{b\cos{\theta}\hat{i}+a\sin{\theta}\hat{j}}{\sqrt{a^{2}\sin^{2}{\theta}+b^{2}\cos^{2}{\theta}}}[/tex]
should be orthogonal with [tex]\hat{T}[/tex] for all [tex]\theta[/tex].

So perhaps this could be used as the normal vector. Am I correct?
 
That looks fine to me; just be sure that you are being asked for the outward normal, and not the inward normal (Your problem statement doesn't say what definition you are using for the unit normal) which differs from your result by a negative sign.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K