Unit vectors for multiple particles? (Quantum Mechanics)

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
It's been a little bit since I have studied multi-particle quantum mechanics and I am a little rusty on the notation.

Let's say I have a wave function, that consists of the tensor product of two spaces, one for each particle moving, ##|\psi_1,\psi_2>##. Each of these particles is moving in a certain direction defined by their respective unit vectors ##\hat{r}_n##, where ##n=1,2##.

If I were to project this wave function onto the position basis to obtain it's functional form, how would I write the unit vectors? Would the unit vectors also have to be a tensor product? For example,

<\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2|\psi_1,\psi_2>=f(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2)\hat{r}_1 \otimes \hat{r}_2

Would this be correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's just an amplitude (complex number)
<\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2|\psi_1,\psi_2>=f(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2) \in \mathbb{Z}
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Xyius
MisterX said:
No, it's just an amplitude (complex number)
<\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2|\psi_1,\psi_2>=f(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2) \in \mathbb{Z}

Oh! Of course! Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top