Unit vectors for multiple particles? (Quantum Mechanics)

Xyius
Messages
501
Reaction score
4
It's been a little bit since I have studied multi-particle quantum mechanics and I am a little rusty on the notation.

Let's say I have a wave function, that consists of the tensor product of two spaces, one for each particle moving, ##|\psi_1,\psi_2>##. Each of these particles is moving in a certain direction defined by their respective unit vectors ##\hat{r}_n##, where ##n=1,2##.

If I were to project this wave function onto the position basis to obtain it's functional form, how would I write the unit vectors? Would the unit vectors also have to be a tensor product? For example,

<\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2|\psi_1,\psi_2>=f(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2)\hat{r}_1 \otimes \hat{r}_2

Would this be correct??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, it's just an amplitude (complex number)
<\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2|\psi_1,\psi_2>=f(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2) \in \mathbb{Z}
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Xyius
MisterX said:
No, it's just an amplitude (complex number)
<\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2|\psi_1,\psi_2>=f(\vec{r}_1,\vec{r}_2) \in \mathbb{Z}

Oh! Of course! Thanks!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
Is it possible, and fruitful, to use certain conceptual and technical tools from effective field theory (coarse-graining/integrating-out, power-counting, matching, RG) to think about the relationship between the fundamental (quantum) and the emergent (classical), both to account for the quasi-autonomy of the classical level and to quantify residual quantum corrections? By “emergent,” I mean the following: after integrating out fast/irrelevant quantum degrees of freedom (high-energy modes...
Back
Top