Unitary operators preserve normalization in arbitrary basis

bjnartowt
Messages
265
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement



To test my knowledge of Sakurai, I asked myself to: "Prove that an operator being unitary is independent of basis."


The Attempt at a Solution



I want to show the expansion coefficients’ squared magnitudes sum to unity at time “t”, given that they do at time t = t0.
Consider expanding an arbitrary –ket at t0, in the arbitrary basis a’,

\left| {\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle = {\bf{I}}\left| {\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle = \left( {\sum\nolimits_{a'} {\left| {a'} \right\rangle \left\langle {a'} \right|} } \right)\left| {\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle = \sum\nolimits_{a'} {\left| {a'} \right\rangle \left\langle {a'|\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle } = \sum\nolimits_{a'} {{c_{a'}}({t_0}) \cdot \left| {a'} \right\rangle }

Note that the work directly above is a ket that has not yet time-evolved, so the expansion using the identity-operator and the notation of the expansion coefficients{c_{a'}}({t_0}) = \left\langle {a'|\alpha ,{t_0}} \right\rangle, is still our “business-as-usual” expansion from Chapter 1.

Now, consider a ket, whatever that ket may be, at some later time “t”. The time “t” is just a label, so we can use the same procedure that we used in [I.8] to construct the time-evolved ket,

\left| {\alpha ,t} \right\rangle = \sum\nolimits_{a'} {{c_{a'}}(t) \cdot \left| {a'} \right\rangle }

So we see that in [I.8] and [I.9], we have two sets of coefficients, and , respectively. I’m not sure how these two sets of coefficients are related to one another...well, I know they sum to unity in both bases. Can't find the expression for how coefficients change in a basis! :-P

What's the expression for the coefficients in an expansion before and after a basis-switch?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am not sure if that is what you want, but:

Write

|\alpha,t\rangle=U(t-t_0)|\alpha,t_0\rangle

Then you can calculate c_{a''}(t) in terms of c_{a'}(t_0)

and matrix elements

\langle a''|U(t-t_0)|a'\rangle
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top