Schools University Physics: Comparing Honours & HL

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the disparity between Honours level university physics and IB physics HL, as well as similar gaps in mathematics courses. The consensus is that the difference largely depends on the quality of the high school curriculum and the specific texts used. Concerns are raised about the dilution of AP courses over the past 30 years, with many students struggling in university despite having taken these advanced classes. In Canada, there's a perception that AP courses may mislead students into believing they are better prepared than their peers, which can lead to difficulties in university-level courses. Experiences shared indicate that students with AP backgrounds often face challenges similar to those of their non-AP peers, suggesting that the preparation provided by high school courses may not be as robust as assumed.
l-1j-cho
Messages
104
Reaction score
0
How big is the gap between Honours level university physics and IB physics HL ?(or honours math and HL math or further math)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How long is a piece of string?

This depends on the university and to a certain extent, the instructor.
 
It might help if you tell us the texts used for both the high school course and the university course. For example, a tough honors course at the university freshman level might use Kleppner and Kolenkow for mechanics and Purcell for E&M.

As Vanadium 50 points out, it's really going to depend a lot on the quality of the high school course. There has been a huge phenomenon within the last 30 years of the watering down of AP courses, so that in many cases you'll have 30 students in an AP class, and maybe one or two will pass the AP exam. I don't know to what extent this is also true of IB.
 
at our school, we use Giancoli (I don;t know if we recognize this)
 
i guess the first one, but 4th edition, published in 1980
 
bcrowell said:
It might help if you tell us the texts used for both the high school course and the university course. For example, a tough honors course at the university freshman level might use Kleppner and Kolenkow for mechanics and Purcell for E&M.

As Vanadium 50 points out, it's really going to depend a lot on the quality of the high school course. There has been a huge phenomenon within the last 30 years of the watering down of AP courses, so that in many cases you'll have 30 students in an AP class, and maybe one or two will pass the AP exam. I don't know to what extent this is also true of IB.

I don't know about the US, but in Canada the impression I get is that AP-type courses do little more than give high school students a false sense that they're way ahead of everyone else, when, in reality, a week or two of university classes could easily catch everyone else up. At my school, the kids who took AP classes in high school struggled just as much in first year engineering as everyone else.
 
thegreenlaser said:
I don't know about the US, but in Canada the impression I get is that AP-type courses do little more than give high school students a false sense that they're way ahead of everyone else, when, in reality, a week or two of university classes could easily catch everyone else up. At my school, the kids who took AP classes in high school struggled just as much in first year engineering as everyone else.
Yeah, I agree about Canada and people's approach when having AP classes under their belt. A friend that did his AP's in the US (so sample size = 1) got transfer credit for Calculus, but not for Linear Algebra. So we took the latter together, and while he knew some concepts I didn't, he eventually struggled much more than I did, and was ultimately happy to just finish the course. I can only speculate, but I'm pretty sure part of the reason was that he was too sure of himself due to AP's, and he thought this prepared him better than was actually true. He namely had the same view of Calculus I, which he was glad to get credit for, as he thought he knew all of that stuff already, as well. I don't know what they learned in AP Calculus, but whatever it was, our Calculus professor seemed to think it's not a good thing that students get transfer credit for that and can forego taking Calculus I in university. My friend disagreed with this quite strongly, but I have an equally strong and negative opinion about people getting credit for doing high school courses. To me it seems quite clear these offer a false sense of security, but the substance is lacking.
 

Similar threads

Replies
36
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
102
Views
5K
Back
Top