News Unnerving wording in UN Resolution

  • Thread starter Thread starter The Smoking Man
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Resolution
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the geopolitical implications of potential U.S. military action in Syria, drawing parallels to the Iraq invasion. It highlights the influence of China and Russia in the UN, which has led to a resolution that refrains from imposing economic sanctions on Syria, instead warning of unspecified further actions if cooperation is lacking. The conversation also touches on conspiracy theories regarding weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and the motivations behind U.S. interventions, suggesting that the U.S. may select targets based on strategic interests rather than random choice. Concerns are raised about the backing Syria and Iran receive from powerful allies, indicating that any military plans could face significant opposition. The dialogue reflects a broader skepticism about U.S. foreign policy and its implications for global stability, emphasizing the disconnect between government actions and public perception.
The Smoking Man
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
Considering the way in which Iraq was invaded:

It was determined opposition by veto-wielding China and Russia that led the co-sponsors of the resolution, Britain, France and the United States, to drop a reference in an earlier draft threatening economic and diplomatic sanctions under article 41 of the UN Charter.

Instead the resolution adopted earlier Monday warned Syria that if it failed to cooperate fully, the council "if necessary, could consider (unspecified) further action."

"The Mehlis report is still a preliminary report and the commission itself believes that the investigation is yet to be completed and there is no final conclusion," Li told the council.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051031/wl_asia_afp/unsyrialebanonhariri"

We all know how the USA interpreted this the last time.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The Smoking Man said:
Considering the way in which Iraq was invaded:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20051031/wl_asia_afp/unsyrialebanonhariri"
We all know how the USA interpreted this the last time.
Bolton comes to mind.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Question: If the USA does decide to go into Syria and the Far right wackjobs still consider this to be the destination of all those WMD from Iraq, do they just select a new country at random or is there a formula for deciding where they get 'shipped' to the next time?

Did Saddam master 'weather control' and produce a sandstorm on command to facilitate this?

For the non-tinfoiled among us, do they consider all the bad weather in the last little while a way of disguising what they are doing?

"Enquiring minds want to know.®©"
 
The Smoking Man said:
Question: If the USA does decide to go into Syria and the Far right wackjobs still consider this to be the destination of all those WMD from Iraq, do they just select a new country at random or is there a formula for deciding where they get 'shipped' to the next time?
"We have satellite pictures of the weapons being moved into Fiji. Would I lie to you?" :smile:
 
Archon said:
"We have satellite pictures of the weapons being moved into Fiji. Would I lie to you?" :smile:
LA-la-la-la http://zapatopi.net/afdb/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Smoking Man said:
LA-la-la-la http://zapatopi.net/afdb/"
But Evo can and yes ... I AM talking to myself! Bwahahhah.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Smoking Man said:
LA-la-la-la http://zapatopi.net/afdb/"
Oh yeah? Well, 9-11 we're currently researching a new 9-11 mind-control device which will allow us 9-11 to control demo...er...terrorists. This will help us win the War on Terror, and it's God's will. 9-11 9-11 9-11. So there!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Saddam sandstorm machine would make great conspiracy theory stuff! You might be able to get on drudge, limbaugh, and fox.:smile:

The real problem with this whole line that is being pursued at the UN is the fact that Syria and Iran have some backers that may may not stand for it. According to these two articles, it seems that China and Russia will have a problem with any kind of invasion plans that the house monkeys are trying to conjure up, perhaps to distract from their current debacle.

http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jid/jid051027_1_n.shtml"
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=ahyBAeYj1xZg&refer=top_world_news"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
polyb said:
The Saddam sandstorm machine would make great conspiracy theory stuff! You might be able to get on drudge, limbaugh, and fox.:smile:

The real problem with this whole line that is being pursued at the UN is the fact that Syria and Iran have some backers that may may not stand for it. According to these two articles, it seems that China and Russia will have a problem with any kind of invasion plans that the house monkeys are trying to conjure up, perhaps to distract from their current debacle.

http://www.janes.com/security/international_security/news/jid/jid051027_1_n.shtml"
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=10000087&sid=ahyBAeYj1xZg&refer=top_world_news"
Well, like Dick said, "the good Lord didn't see fit to put oil and gas reserves where there are democratic governments." ... and since China has a big contract with Iran ... And America quashed Unocal ... Ummm. Sorry where were we going with this? Did the USA intend to get support from this side of the ocean?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #10
polyb said:
The Saddam sandstorm machine would make great conspiracy theory stuff! You might be able to get on drudge, limbaugh, and fox.
And Shhhh ... I'm working on an exclusinve deal with the 700 Club and as soon as we get the image of Satan Photoshopped into the sand cloud things look to be a done deal.
 
  • #11
The Smoking Man said:
We all know how the USA interpreted this the last time.

Not the USA, just those in power at the moment. Bush and his crooks are not "the USA".
 
  • #12
Ivan Seeking said:
Not the USA, just those in power at the moment. Bush and his crooks are not "the USA".
USA = US Government = Bush = Aliens

Going along with the theme here...
 
  • #13
Archon said:
USA = US Government = Bush = Aliens
Going along with the theme here...

The USA is defined by the Constitution and not the person who happens to be sitting in the oval office today.

Was the aliens thing just a cheap shot is that supposed to mean something?
 
  • #14
Ivan Seeking said:
Not the USA, just those in power at the moment. Bush and his crooks are not "the USA".
I'm sorry ... the USA is a democracy. Nit pick all you want but you are 'ruled/led' by the actions of one man decided by the will of the people.

Voting or apathy in not voting result in the same decision ... that the will of the people ... America is done IN YOUR NAME.

Now we can HOPE that common sense takes over next time and you get a decent leader but when we talk of Gemany during the second world war, we rarely mention Karl in Dusseldorf who didn't really want Hitler in power. From the outside, you are viewed in the same light.

Bush acts for you because this is the 'social contract' you have that is your constitution.

Hey, I know your pain ... as a white guy with brown hair and hazel eyes, I can't go to a lot of places in this world that I was used to going for the same reason ... PEOPLE THINK I'M AMERICAN.

I deal with it.

So should you.
 

Similar threads

News Bush Honest & Trustworthy Until How Many Lies?
2
Replies
65
Views
10K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top