Unraveling the Controversy: Understanding Light's Dimensions and Properties

  • Thread starter Thread starter scott_sieger
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around the complex nature of light, particularly its dimensionality and mass properties. Participants debate whether light is two-dimensional or zero-dimensional, with some asserting that it cannot be seen in three dimensions unless reflected. The conversation touches on light's lack of rest mass while acknowledging its energy-related mass, leading to confusion over definitions of mass in physics. There is a consensus that the understanding of light remains controversial, with many theories and definitions existing without a clear resolution. The dialogue highlights the ongoing struggle to reconcile these scientific concepts, suggesting a need for clearer definitions and understanding.
  • #31
Originally posted by Anton A. Ermolenko
Don't mention it, Pete. Thank's for discussion.
You're welcome.

Just one last note. There are many people who claim that mass, m, always means 'rest mass' and that is what the entire physics community means when they use this term. I've composed a list of counter examples to dispel this myth. See

http://www.geocities.com/physics_world/relativistic_mass.htm

Pete
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
14K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K