Unraveling the Energy Redshift Paradox in General Relativity | Physics Post

Messages
19,773
Reaction score
10,727
Within the framework of General Relativity in one of its most simple forms, the Schwarzschild solution, a very interesting paradox can be proposed involving the conservation of work / energy. It’s a puzzle for the Relativity buff. In this short discussion I outline this energy redshift paradox, and the implications for an attempted solution.

http://physicspost.com/articles.php?articleId=179
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
correct me if I am wrong but in the article erich states that acceleration is dx/dt^2 i think he forgot to raise the d to square because the notation for second deravative is d^2x/dt^2.
 


The energy redshift paradox in General Relativity is a fascinating and thought-provoking puzzle that challenges our understanding of the conservation of energy. The paradox arises from the fact that according to the Schwarzschild solution, the energy of a photon decreases as it travels away from a massive object. This seems to contradict the principle of conservation of energy, which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transformed from one form to another.

The implications of this paradox are significant for our understanding of General Relativity and its predictions. It raises questions about the validity of the Schwarzschild solution and how it fits into the larger framework of General Relativity. It also challenges our understanding of how energy behaves in the presence of massive objects and whether the principle of conservation of energy holds true in all situations.

One potential solution to this paradox is the concept of gravitational time dilation, which suggests that time runs slower in a strong gravitational field. This would mean that the energy of a photon decreases not because it loses energy, but because time is passing slower for the observer measuring its energy. However, this solution is not without its own challenges and has been a subject of much debate and research.

Another proposed solution is the idea of gravitational potential energy, which suggests that the energy of a photon decreases as it climbs out of a gravitational potential well. This would mean that the energy redshift is not a violation of the conservation of energy, but rather a result of the photon's change in potential energy. However, this solution also has its own limitations and is still a subject of ongoing research and discussion.

Overall, the energy redshift paradox in General Relativity is a complex and intriguing problem that continues to challenge our understanding of the universe. It highlights the need for further research and exploration in this field and serves as a reminder that our understanding of the laws of physics is constantly evolving and subject to change.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. The Relativator was sold by (as printed) Atomic Laboratories, Inc. 3086 Claremont Ave, Berkeley 5, California , which seems to be a division of Cenco Instruments (Central Scientific Company)... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/relativator-circular-slide-rule-simulated-with-desmos/ by @robphy
Back
Top