Unraveling the Mystery Behind Energy Equations

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Inertigratus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the similarities in energy equations, specifically kinetic energy and the energy stored in capacitors and inductors. Participants highlight that energy is proportional to the square of a rate of change, with underlying linear relationships such as charge and voltage for capacitors and momentum and velocity for moving bodies. The integral of kx with respect to x explains the 1/2 factor in these equations. It is noted that non-linear relationships, such as those in Special Relativity, do not conform to the standard quadratic form for energy.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy equations
  • Familiarity with capacitor and inductor energy storage
  • Basic knowledge of calculus, specifically integration
  • Concepts of linear and non-linear relationships in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinetic energy from basic principles
  • Explore the relationship between charge and voltage in capacitors
  • Learn about the implications of non-linear momentum-velocity relationships in Special Relativity
  • Investigate the mathematical representation of potential energy functions
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching electromagnetism, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of energy equations.

Inertigratus
Messages
123
Reaction score
0
I was just wondering, why do the energy equations look so alike?
Refering to kinetic energy, the energy stored by capacitors and inductors, etc.
My teacher in electromagnetism said something about it, that there's a reason for this.
The energy is proportional to some rate of change squared?
 
Science news on Phys.org
In all the cases you've mentioned we have an underlying linear relationship (e.g. between charge and voltage for a capacitor, momentum and velocity for a moving body), and the energy is found as the area of a triangle underneath the linear graph, or, algebraically as the integral of kx wrt x. Hence the 1/2.

[Where we don't have the linear relationship (e.g. the non-linear momentum-velocity relationship in Special Relativity) we don't get the (1/2) k x^2 form for energy]
 
Last edited:
Usually you'll find kinetic energy to be quadratic in velocities
Why?
depends where you're coming from really, it could be a 'it just is' matter or it could be because the action in relativity is proportional to the integral of arclength. you could perhaps argue that it must be velocities squared because it shouldn't matter which direction the velocity is in
there are lots of reasons that it should be in the form that it is but would it be possible to say which is the cause of it's form and which are the cause of it's form? I'd guess not
the potential energy doesn't have this same standard form however, it can be any function of coordinates you want it to be

just my two cents
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K