Unraveling the Mystery of Extra Dimensions in Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dephenistrator
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the existence of additional dimensions in physics, particularly in relation to string theory, which suggests there could be up to 26 hidden dimensions. Current research supports this theory, indicating that these dimensions may remain undetected either because they are too small or because we exist in a three-dimensional slice of a higher-dimensional space. Participants recommend resources like the website superstringtheory.com and the book "The Elegant Universe" by Brian Greene for further exploration of the topic. The conversation emphasizes the uncertainty surrounding the exact number of dimensions and encourages asking the right questions for deeper understanding. Overall, the mystery of extra dimensions remains a significant and intriguing area of study in physics.
Dephenistrator
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have a 12 grade Physics report due, topic:

answer an unanswered physics question.
my question= Are there additional dimentions?

if anyone has any information on this topic, can point me to a website, or anything else helpful, that would be great.

im expectiong to hear...
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dephenistrator said:
answer an unanswered physics question.
my question= Are there additional dimentions?

Yes,there are.Additional to how many??3,4,10,11,26??

Daniel.

PS.I believe u can be given a good answer here.But try first to ask the right question. :wink:
 
Brief answer: nobody knows for sure, but if sting theory is correct, there may be up to 26 "hidden" spatial dimensions.

Some more info:

Current research in mathematical physics strongly favors a theory (string theory) that predicts the existence of as many as 26 dimentions.

If that is so, and nature actually has as many dimensions, there are (at least) two possible ways in which they remain "hidden" to us:
1. If they are too small, so that we do not notice,
2. If we are confined in a three-dimensional slice of the 26D space,

You can find more info in http://www.superstringtheory.com. If you find something hard to understand in there, feel free to come back and ask.
 
Watch the elegant universe...

or read the book... by brian greene
 
special

ahrkron

did you mean special instead of spatial? if not i guess in this subject they are interchangeable maybe. yes, of course, other dimensions. dimension=mision-die=mis ion ide. there's a million maybe. c-eve with a smile >wink<
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top