Unraveling the Mystery of Particle Accelerators and High-Speed Travel

AI Thread Summary
Particle accelerators can accelerate protons to 99.99% of the speed of light (c) despite the implications of relativity, which state that mass increases and energy requirements become infinite as objects approach light speed. This is achieved by using immense amounts of energy and gradually increasing the speed of particles with each pass through the accelerator. The size of facilities like the Tevatron and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) is necessary to accommodate the extensive energy and time required for such acceleration. Calculating the energy needed to accelerate a proton to 99% of c involves using relativistic kinetic energy formulas, which account for the increasing mass. The number of revolutions needed for a proton to reach this speed varies based on the specific acceleration methods employed.
amt
Messages
52
Reaction score
0
So, according to Relativity, as an oject approaches the speed of light, it's mass increases and the Energy required to sustain the motion goes to infinity, basically making high speed travel almost impossible.

How is it that Particle accelerators are able to accelerate Protons at 99.99% of 'c'? Protons do possesses mass don't they?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
amt said:
So, according to Relativity, as an oject approaches the speed of light, it's mass increases and the Energy required to sustain the motion goes to infinity, basically making high speed travel almost impossible.

How is it that Particle accelerators are able to accelerate Protons at 99.99% of 'c'? Protons do possesses mass don't they?

They are able to do that using lots and lots of energy/power/electricity, and by kicking the particles faster a little bit at a time during each pass. It is why the Tevatron at Fermilab is so large, and why the LHC being built at CERN is even larger. Just to go from 99.99%c to 99.999%c takes A LOT of resources.

Zz.
 
To accelerate 1 proton to 99% of 'c', how much energy is required?

If the particle accelerator has a radius of 5 miles, how many revolutions has the proton got to make before achieving 99% of 'c'?

Thanks.
 
amt said:
To accelerate 1 proton to 99% of 'c', how much energy is required?

If the particle accelerator has a radius of 5 miles, how many revolutions has the proton got to make before achieving 99% of 'c'?

Thanks.

Er... just find the KE with v=0.99c if you want to do this classically, or add a "gamma" factor into the relatistic KE. That will give you roughly the ballpark values.

The 2nd question does not have an answer because it depends on A LOT of things, such as what kind of acceleration mechanism is being used, how many cells are in the linac, etc.

Zz.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top