Unraveling the Mystery: X-Rays from Black Holes

AI Thread Summary
X-rays detected from black holes originate primarily from the hot accretion disk surrounding them, which emits radiation as it falls into the black hole. This process involves the conversion of gravitational potential energy into heat, with additional contributions from friction and differential rotation within the disk. While some X-rays can also arise from jets or other phenomena, the accretion disk is a common feature in quasars, facilitating the release of energy as radiation. It's important to note that objects falling directly into a black hole do not emit radiation unless they are part of an accretion disk. The ongoing study of these emissions continues to reveal complexities, including connections to gamma-ray bursts.
blumfeld0
Messages
146
Reaction score
0
Light cannot escape from a black hole; however, x-rays have been detected from black holes. How is this possible?

is it because of the accretion disk? where does it come from?
is that all there is to the answer?

thanks
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
As the accretion disc falls into a black hole it releases massive amounts of gravitational potential energy which heats the disc up. The hot accretion disc then emits x-ray radiation. The x-rays do not come from the black hole and they can escape because they are nowhere near the event horizon.
 
Kurdt said:
As the accretion disc falls into a black hole it releases massive amounts of gravitational potential energy which heats the disc up. The hot accretion disc then emits x-ray radiation.
Can one simply say that gravitational potential energy is converted into heat? Is it not rather the compression of dusty gas, with accompanying friction that does the heating? I do not recall reading that a solo object falling straight into a black hole releases energy; it needs to be in an accretion disk as far as I know.
 
The accretion disk rotates differentially which also causes the heating but the energy has to come from somwhere and that is the gravitational potential.
 
There are several processes that can produce X-rays in a quasar, including thermal, synchrotron and inverse compton emission. Sometimes the X-rays come from the disk, other times from a jet. A disk (or something disk-like) is thought to be present in every quasar, while jets only appear in some of them.

It's true that an object falling into a black hole does not necessarily need to emit radiation -- there are orbits that pass through the event horizon. In that case, the gravitational potential energy would be converted to kinetic energy rather than radiation. However, disks are thought to appear in all quasars, so some of the gravitational potential energy invariably gets converted into radiation. There is a massive pool of energy and, whatever form it takes in the short-run (infall, magnetic fields, jets, winds), there is some radiation mechanism that can occur and make the process observable.
 
XRFs

blumfeld0 said:
Light cannot escape from a black hole; however, x-rays have been detected from black holes
There is no signal which can escape from a black hole. It is for that it is called black hole. The emission of X-radiation can be produced by several phenomena like the synchrotron radiation and the inverse Compton effect. But the principal cause is always ignored. There are several models which try to explain that like the model of accretion disc, coalescence between a black hole and neutron star, and there is also several telescopes embarked on satellite which observe this phenomenon for a long time.
One quotes also the mystery of gamma ray bursts (GRBs) who lasts since more than 30 without real resolution.
Thanks
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
5K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Back
Top