Unraveling the Nested Radical: A Hint for Solving the Infinite Series Equation

  • Thread starter Thread starter Daggy
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around an infinite nested radical expression involving square roots and a series of equations that suggest a relationship between integers and their square roots. Participants are exploring the nature of this expression and its convergence properties.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive relationships between the nested radicals and integers, questioning the validity of their reasoning and seeking formal definitions for the infinite series. Some suggest using substitution and mathematical induction, while others express uncertainty about handling the root expressions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing hints and suggestions for approaching the problem. There is acknowledgment of the complexity of defining the iterated square root and its convergence, but no explicit consensus has been reached on a solution or method.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for a formal definition of the iterated square root and express confusion regarding the handling of root expressions. There are references to mathematical induction and comparisons to the golden ratio, indicating a search for deeper connections.

Daggy
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Problem --

Homework Statement



Give me a hint

Homework Equations



[tex]\sqrt{1 + \sqrt{1 + 2\sqrt{1 + 3\sqrt{1 + 4\sqrt{1 + \cdots}}}}} = ?[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Can someone help me get in the right direction, and give a little hint?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Cute. VERRY cute. Contemplate the following series of equations:
2=sqrt(1+1*3)
3=sqrt(1+2*4)
4=sqrt(1+3*5)
5=sqrt(1+4*6)
...
 


seems likely to fit for 2

Then

[tex] <br /> 2 = \sqrt{1 + \sqrt{1 + 2\sqrt{1 + 3\sqrt{...}}}}[/tex]

Then n must be such that

[tex] <br /> n = \sqrt{n + ((n-1)(n +1))}<br /> [/tex]

Which fits for all n.. Is this correct resoning? Can someone give me a more formal explanation if it is (or isn't)..
 


2 doesn't solve n=sqrt(n+(n-1)(n+1)). But yes, I would say the whole thing is equal to 2. If you want to get formal, then you have to define what the whole iterated square root means to begin with. How to truncate it and define it as a convergent series?
 


actually ment

[tex]n = \sqrt{1 + (n + 1)(n - 1)}[/tex]
[/tex]
an so on. But that doesn't get me any further. Don't really know how to handle the rootexpressions. However, it seems to have som similarities with the root form of the golden ratio
[tex] \phi^2 = \phi + 1 [/tex]

[tex] \phi = \sqrt{1 + \sqrt{1 + \sqrt{1 + \sqrt{1 + \cdots}}}}<br /> [/tex]
 
Last edited:


I don't think you are seeing it. Substitute 3=sqrt(1+2*4) for the '3' in 2=sqrt(1+1*3). Now substitute 4=sqrt(1+3*5) into that. Etc etc.
 


Ok, I see know. Thanks a lot
 


But inserting it just gives av pinpoint of the solution. tried using mathematical induction to prove it formula, but i did'nt seem correct. are there better methods to prove this, eventually define this as a series in a way?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
6K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K