Unsolved Problem: Are Outcomes of Two Inspectors Independent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter hypermonkey2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interesting
hypermonkey2
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
Heres something i came across in a book but there's no solution...
take two inspectors in a factory (they can't talk to each other), and they inspect a series of products and they deem them defective or not. So the results would be (D,N), (N,N) ... where each coordinate is each inpectors verdict.
are the outcomes independent?

I would think not. But i cannot formalize that. thoughts?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do the two inspectors determine whether a product shoud be deemed defective or not defective?

What exactly do you mean by independent outcomes? That the ratings for different products of the series are independent? Or that that the two inspectors' opinions on one fixed product are independent? Or something else?

To give an answer to any of these question you need to specify how the inspectors decide upon their opinion regarding a (maybe defective) item.
 
They inspect the product. Essentially, i think that IF we assume that they perform some sort of inspection, that IF one inspector deems it defective, that it is MORE likely that the product actually IS defective, so it is MORE probable that the second inspector deems it defective too.
In that sense, the outcomes are dependent, no?
Right, it is the products of the series that are independent.
What do you think?
 
hypermonkey2 said:
Essentially, i think that IF we assume that they perform some sort of inspection, that IF one inspector deems it defective, that it is MORE likely that the product actually IS defective, so it is MORE probable that the second inspector deems it defective too.
In that sense, the outcomes are dependent, no?

I agree with you.
 
Great! How to formalize it?
 
You can't formalize the conclusion without the assumptions being formalized as well. Formalizing the assumptions would make the conclusion trivially follow.
 
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top