Upper Darboux Integral: Not Integrable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ergonomics
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integral
ergonomics
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
if a function f is not integrable does it imply, that there exists such an epsilon that whichever partition P i choose it will follow this condition
Uf,p-Lf,p>=Epsilon?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks ok yea, f:[a,b]->R not integrable implies there exists an e > 0 such that for all partitions P of [a,b], U - L >= e.
 
Last edited:
Thank you.
 
Back
Top