Uranus' closest approach to earth and its interval

AI Thread Summary
Calculating the interval between Earth and Uranus' closest approach can vary significantly based on the desired accuracy. For a rough estimate, the time between Uranus' oppositions is about a year, while considering its orbital eccentricity extends this to approximately 84 years. For precise calculations, including both planets' eccentricities and apsidal precession, the interval could reach around 100,000 years. Resources like the Jet Propulsion Laboratory provide ephemerides that track these orbits, and the closest approach for this year occurred on October 7. Understanding these factors is crucial for anyone looking to investigate further.
BOAS
Messages
546
Reaction score
19
Hello,

I am looking for a website that contains information such as the interval between Earth and uranus' closest approach. I can't seem to find exactly what I am looking for, so I was wondering how difficult it would be to calculate this.

I am at a loss where to start though...

Any pointers or info would be greatly appreciated,

thanks!
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
I suspect that you will have to integrate the apsides Uranus and Earth.
 
Depends on how accurate you want to be.

Do you want to know the interval between the time Uranus is in opposition(which would be close to a year)?
Do you want to take into account Uranus' rather siginificant orbital eccentricity(that'll come out to something close to 84 years)?
Or, maybe you want to know the closest possible approach(within some error bars), taking into account both planets' eccentricities? Then you'd have to include apsidal precession, and the result would be in the order of 100000 years.

All the calculations are similar to that of calculating the interval between when two hands of a clock meet.

What's the level of precision you're looking for?
 
Bandersnatch said:
Depends on how accurate you want to be.

Do you want to know the interval between the time Uranus is in opposition(which would be close to a year)?
Do you want to take into account Uranus' rather siginificant orbital eccentricity(that'll come out to something close to 84 years)?
Or, maybe you want to know the closest possible approach(within some error bars), taking into account both planets' eccentricities? Then you'd have to include apsidal precession, and the result would be in the order of 100000 years.

All the calculations are similar to that of calculating the interval between when two hands of a clock meet.

What's the level of precision you're looking for?
The first one - Actually, what you have said makes perfect sense. The clock hand analogy is very useful, and I think I can investigate this further, under the assumption of circular orbits.

Thanks.
 
BOAS said:
Hello,

I am looking for a website that contains information such as the interval between Earth and uranus' closest approach. I can't seem to find exactly what I am looking for, so I was wondering how difficult it would be to calculate this.

I am at a loss where to start though...

Any pointers or info would be greatly appreciated,

thanks!

Unless you're some kind of orbital genius, it's probably not recommended.

Organizations like the Jet Propulsion Laboratory keep tabs on the orbits of various bodies in the solar system by producing ephemerides (singular, ephemeris). The CPA of Uranus apparently has already occurred for this year (Oct. 7):

http://in-the-sky.org/news.php?id=20141007_13_100
 
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top