Alright. So you guys already know that the first dimension is simply a line (according to our 3-space perspective).(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

The second dimension extends a line at 90 degrees from the first, creating a plane.

Adding yet another line 90 degrees from the first two lends a cube. You may spare no great expense visualising the corner of a 'box' to see the corner has three line elements; all at 90 degrees from each other, that lend it the property of the cube.

Now here comes the tricky part: Add another line to the corner of our cube; 90 degrees in relation to the other three lines, and we obtain the hypercube ("Tesseract"), which is the fourth-dimension analogue of our regular, ol' cube.

Now I'm asking if the human mind is capable of visualising something like this. I have a hypothesis that answers this in the affermative, but I still need help. But first, some background.

- A 3-D sphere entering then leaving the second dimention would appear as a circle that starts from a point, grows to the max diameter of the sphere, then shrinks back into nothingness
- Likewise, a hypersphere entering our 3-D space would appear to us as a regular ol' sphere beginning at a point, growing to the maximum diameter of the hypersphere, then decreasing in size to nothingness.
- A 2-D organism would observe the sphere entering his universe as an object with depth and height, but no width. We may interpret this as an infinitely-thin sliver; an infinitely thin slice of a 3-D sphere.
- As 3-D organisms, we percieve the 4-D hypersphere entering our universe as a regular ol' sphere having height, depth and width but not omega (omega is the fourth-dimensional line element. Thus, we have width, length, height and omega). The fourth-dimensional organism would interpret the sphere we see as an infinitely thin slice of his hypersphere.
Interesting properties:When we, as 3-D organisms, look at any surface in our universe, what we're actually looking at is second-dimentionalplanes.Just look at a box if you don't believe me: The box you're looking at is consisting of threeplanesjoined in 3-space to form a cube.

Likewise, the organism in 2-space, when looking at his square, is actually looking at lines. Two of them, provided the corner of the square is seen.

It stands to reason, therefore, that any fourth-dimentional organism looking at the surface of his hypercube would actually be looking atcubes.That's right: The surface of the hypercube is thecube,just like the surface of our cube is theplane.

Now my question is this: Since we are 3-D organisms with 3-D imaginations and 3-D powers of visualisation, is it possible for us to actually visualise a hypercube? Or, does our 3-D brain prevent us from fathoming such an object? Remember now, regardless of size, our cube (think box or something) to the 4-D organism is an infinitely thin sliver of his 4-D hypercube. Think of the possibilities: I can stuff a box of cereal into a box that measures 14" by 10" by 3". But in the fourth dimension, I can actually stuff an infinite number of cereal boxes in the hypercube, even though the dimensions of the hypercube are finite (14" by 10" by 3" by X" omega)!

I have alot more to say on the subject. But do you guys think that visualising such a space is possible? I mean, Dr. Sagan once was quoted as saying he can visualise 4-space. Then Dr. Hawking turns around and says, "I have a hard time visualising the third dimension -- let alone the fourth!"

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Us humans visualising the fourth dimensional line element

Loading...

Similar Threads - humans visualising fourth | Date |
---|---|

Human evolution - From sperm to ape | Feb 2, 2018 |

I'm Terrified of Human Extinction | Aug 17, 2017 |

How do you visualise your future self? | Apr 17, 2016 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**