US Shortage of STEM Professionals: Fact or Fiction?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TEMYCH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fiction Stem
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the perceived shortage of professionals in the scientific, mathematical, and engineering fields in the U.S. Participants express skepticism about the claim of a significant shortage, noting that while there may be a lack in certain areas, fields like computer science are well-staffed. Historical context is provided, referencing a post-WWII surge in engineering graduates due to the GI Bill. Concerns are raised about the prestige of scientific careers diminishing in modern society, potentially discouraging youth from pursuing these paths. Some argue that maintaining a shortage of professionals could benefit workers by increasing wages and job security, while others highlight the ongoing push to attract more women and minorities into STEM fields. The conversation also touches on the outsourcing of engineering jobs, questioning the sincerity of political claims regarding workforce shortages. Overall, the dialogue reflects a complex view of the current state of STEM professions in the U.S. and the implications for the workforce.
TEMYCH
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I've read several articles in newspapers and on several sites ( such as cnn.com) concerning US and its serious lack of professionals with scientific, mathematical and engineering skills. Is it really true? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Have any links? I don't know if there are any actual new problems, but the US has always been a little thin on engineering/science professionals. Too many people these days go to college and major in "liberal studies" or something that they can't use when they graduate.

Doesn't bother me though - supply and demand means engineers get paid rather well.
 
russ_watters said:
...but the US has always been a little thin on engineering/science professionals.
There was an upsurge after WWII as I recall, due to the GI bill. Lots of people who couldn't otherwise have afforded a college education took advantage of this, and a lot of campuses were overrun with ex-GIs. Most of these were attracted to purely practical fields like engineering, and agriculture.

I doubt today you could accurately say we're thin in the area of computer science. Other branches of science and engineering, possibly.
 
We have to face it:
Mathematicians&scientists have always been "oddballs".
What has changed, though, in the latter half of the 20th century, is that the intellectual elite no longer dominates and controls the public arenas as they used to, like newspapers. In effect, we've experienced a democratization of civil society, and thus, it is no longer the admiration of the intellectuals you'll find in the mass media, rather the ridicule of them.
This makes a career in science seem less prestigious to youths than it may have seemed earlier.
 
russ_watters said:
Doesn't bother me though - supply and demand means engineers get paid rather well.

If you're not part of the solution, there's good money to be made in prolonging the problem. I want an even bigger shortage on professionals. Instead of having rough competition for a $15/h job with no benefits, a $20/h job with lots of benefits is just handed to you.
You can even see that difference between cities. In Edmonton, you can make about $12/h doing construction, and overtime is 1.5x normal wage. In Fort McMurray, about 4 hours north of Edmonton, you can get paid $20/h as a janitor, and overtime on holidays like Christmas you get paid 3x your normal wage.

There are some benefits of having more workers of any kind, but most of those benefits go to companies and their share holders. As a worker, I would rather maintain a shortage.
 
Last edited:
One of my professors said that the US is rather thin on physicists and it looks like we're going to hit a slump in about 8 years... good news for me :D
 
ShawnD said:
There are some benefits of having more workers of any kind, but the only real benefit goes to companies or share holders. As a worker, I would rather maintain a shortage.
Quite so.
The more educated the population becomes (i.e, the more replaceable each person becomes), the greater percentage of their valuable output will go into the pockets of the employers.
 
arildno said:
The more educated the population becomes (i.e, the more replaceable each person becomes)

Excellent wording. Being replaceable is the last thing any worker wants.
 
ShawnD said:
I want an even bigger shortage on professionals. Instead of having rough competition for a $15/h job with no benefits, a $20/h job with lots of benefits is just handed to you.
Food for thought.
 
  • #10
TEMYCH said:
I've read several articles in newspapers and on several sites ( such as cnn.com) concerning US and its serious lack of professionals with scientific, mathematical and engineering skills. Is it really true? Thanks.

There is a big push for getting more science/engineering types through schools. I personally do not see a shortage of engineers in my area. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting 5 of us around here. It seems to me that the bigger push is getting women and minorities more interested in the sciences.

I do find it pretty dubious for people to be saying that in political circles when more and more scientific/engineering jobs are being pushed off shore to foreign countries.
 
  • #11
FredGarvin said:
There is a big push for getting more science/engineering types through schools. I personally do not see a shortage of engineers in my area. You can't swing a dead cat without hitting 5 of us around here. It seems to me that the bigger push is getting women and minorities more interested in the sciences.

I do find it pretty dubious for people to be saying that in political circles when more and more scientific/engineering jobs are being pushed off shore to foreign countries.

Since when are politicians supposed to be self-consistent? They couldn't give a rats arse about any of us.
 
Back
Top