News US Soldier Killing Violates Geneva Convention: Cold & Sickening

  • Thread starter Thread starter username
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Convention
AI Thread Summary
A disturbing report from the BBC highlighted a US soldier killing a seriously wounded individual in Fallujah, raising concerns about potential violations of the Geneva Convention. The act, described as cold-hearted and cowardly, reflects poorly on the US military and suggests a troubling trend reminiscent of past conflicts like Vietnam. While some argue that there could be justifiable circumstances for such actions, like the presence of civilians or the potential threat from a wounded militant, the killing of a non-threatening, severely injured person is generally considered a war crime. The incident, broadcast to millions, emphasizes the need for military personnel to adhere to international laws and ethical standards to maintain the integrity of the armed forces. It is crucial for the military to investigate such actions to prevent them from becoming normalized and to uphold the principles of the Geneva Convention, which aim to protect the rights and dignity of individuals in armed conflicts.
username
Messages
226
Reaction score
2
Watched a disturbing report on bbc of a us soldier killing a seriously wounded person (through a window) in a room with no escape thought to be an insurgent in Fallujah, it was very cold hearted/cowardly and sickening . Surley this must violate the geneva convention. This must have been broadcast to millions of people it does not look good...

EDIT: Especially the way it was portraited/appeard as if this was a common conduct of us forces. Looks more and more like vietnam or something worse everyday.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
There could be situations where the killing would be justified.

Here's one : if there are civilians in the house that the militant could hold hostage and possibly kill, then it would be justified in killing him.

Two : a severely wounded militant with a grenade in his bag/pocket is still considered dangerous. If he reaches for something, he can be shot. If he's thrown away/given up all his arms and surrendered, he can not be shot.

This may be in violation of the GC, but it would be hard to say with the limited info (do you have a link to a source?).
 
Last edited:
The Geneva Convention is a set of international treaties that establish rules for the protection of victims of armed conflicts, including the treatment of wounded or sick individuals. The actions described in the report, if true, would indeed violate the Geneva Convention.

The killing of a seriously wounded person who poses no immediate threat is considered a war crime and goes against the basic principles of humanity and the laws of war. It is a disturbing and sickening act, and it is understandable that it would be portrayed as a violation of the Geneva Convention.

The fact that this incident was broadcasted to millions of people only adds to the severity of the situation. The actions of this soldier not only reflect poorly on the individual, but also on the entire US military. It is important for military personnel to adhere to the laws and ethical standards set forth by the Geneva Convention in order to maintain the integrity and reputation of their country.

It is also concerning that this incident may be seen as a common conduct of US forces. It is crucial for the military to investigate and address any potential violations of the Geneva Convention to prevent such actions from becoming a norm. Any violation of the Geneva Convention is a serious matter and should not be taken lightly.

In conclusion, the actions described in the report are a clear violation of the Geneva Convention and should be thoroughly investigated and addressed by the appropriate authorities. The principles of the Geneva Convention are in place to protect the rights and dignity of all individuals involved in armed conflicts, and it is important for all parties to abide by them.
 
Similar to the 2024 thread, here I start the 2025 thread. As always it is getting increasingly difficult to predict, so I will make a list based on other article predictions. You can also leave your prediction here. Here are the predictions of 2024 that did not make it: Peter Shor, David Deutsch and all the rest of the quantum computing community (various sources) Pablo Jarrillo Herrero, Allan McDonald and Rafi Bistritzer for magic angle in twisted graphene (various sources) Christoph...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
7K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
10K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
49
Views
7K
Back
Top