USAF 'discovered' pulsars long before Bell Burnell

  • Thread starter Thread starter neutrino
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bell Pulsars
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the claim that the United States Air Force (USAF) discovered pulsars prior to Jocelyn Bell Burnell, although they did not use the term "pulsar" at the time. The conversation references a blog post detailing this assertion, raising questions about the criteria for Nobel Prize eligibility in scientific discoveries. Participants debate the implications of the USAF's findings and the recognition of Bell Burnell's contributions to the field of astrophysics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of pulsar astrophysics
  • Familiarity with Nobel Prize criteria in scientific fields
  • Knowledge of the historical context of the USAF's research initiatives
  • Awareness of Jocelyn Bell Burnell's contributions to astronomy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the historical contributions of the USAF to astrophysics
  • Study the criteria for Nobel Prize nominations and awards in science
  • Explore the significance of pulsars in modern astrophysics
  • Investigate the impact of Jocelyn Bell Burnell's work on the field
USEFUL FOR

Astrophysicists, historians of science, and anyone interested in the recognition of scientific discoveries and contributions in the field of astronomy.

neutrino
Messages
2,093
Reaction score
2
...but they just didn't call it such. :rolleyes:

Interesting story: http://scienceblogs.com/catdynamics/2007/08/schisler.php
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
So, is it technically possible for the USAF to have won a nobel prize :-p?
 
siddharth said:
So, is it technically possible for the USAF to have won a nobel prize :-p?

Why should it have been possible for the USAF when it wasn't possible for Bell Burnell?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 75 ·
3
Replies
75
Views
7K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
11K