Using a solar cell as a qualitative test of laser intensity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the use of a solar cell as a qualitative method to test the intensity of a nitrogen laser output. Participants explore the feasibility of measuring output current from the solar cell as an indicator of laser intensity, considering practical aspects and potential limitations of this approach.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes using a solar cell to measure the output current as a quick test for laser intensity, questioning if this is a reasonable assumption.
  • Another participant confirms that using a solar cell is a valid method, citing their experience with silicon detectors in a lab setting.
  • A different participant suggests that the response of the solar cell may vary depending on the spot size of the laser beam, recommending to move the sensor slightly during measurements to check for consistency in current readings.
  • One participant provides a link to a resource that outlines expected responses based on wavelength, indicating that accurate measurements may require specialized equipment like a laser power meter.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that using a solar cell can be a practical method for testing laser intensity, but there are differing views on the potential variability in measurements based on the laser spot size and the need for more precise equipment for accurate readings.

Contextual Notes

There are considerations regarding the dependence on the laser spot size and the solar cell's surface structure, which may affect the output current readings. The discussion also highlights the potential need for more accurate measurement tools for specific applications.

trini
Messages
216
Reaction score
1
so I am testing out different designs on a nitrogen laser, and wanted a quick way to test whether or not one design had a more intense output than the other. without having to buy a sensor, my idea was to direct the beam onto a solar cell, then measure the output current. higher current wud mean higher intensity. is this a reasonable assumption for the test?
 
Science news on Phys.org
nothing? =(
 
trini said:
so I am testing out different designs on a nitrogen laser, and wanted a quick way to test whether or not one design had a more intense output than the other. without having to buy a sensor, my idea was to direct the beam onto a solar cell, then measure the output current. higher current wud mean higher intensity. is this a reasonable assumption for the test?

Yes, that is the easiest way. I work with silicon detectors for ATLAS, and they are essentially solar cells. This is what we do to measure the intensity of a laser in the lab.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: DDnoob
great thanks =)
 
If it's a very small spot you might want to diffuse it a little - solar cells have structures on the surface (electrodes etc) so the response might depend on exactly where on the cell you hit.

Try moving the sensor around by a few mm as you measure and see if there is any difference in the current
 
trini said:
so I am testing out different designs on a nitrogen laser, and wanted a quick way to test whether or not one design had a more intense output than the other. without having to buy a sensor, my idea was to direct the beam onto a solar cell, then measure the output current. higher current wud mean higher intensity. is this a reasonable assumption for the test?

Knowing the wavelength, here's what you may expect as a response:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Response_silicon_photodiode.svg

If ever you need accurate measurements of average cw power or single pulse energy, google "laser power meter".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 128 ·
5
Replies
128
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K