Using Energy Equations to find Final Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the final velocity of a box sliding down an inclined plane using energy equations. The box, with a mass of 35 kg and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.3, starts from rest on an 8 m ramp inclined at 37 degrees. The net work done on the system was calculated to be 1020 J, and the relationship between work and kinetic energy was explored, leading to the conclusion that both the Work-Energy Theorem and energy conservation principles can be applied. The calculations confirmed that the final velocity at the bottom of the ramp is approximately 7.6 m/s. The logic used in the energy approach was validated, affirming the correctness of the calculations and reasoning.
Foopyblue
Messages
21
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A box slides down an inclined plane (angle = 37*). The mass of the block is 35 kg, the coefficient of kinetic friction between the box and the ramp is 0.3, and the length of the ramp is 8 m. If it starts from rest at the top of the ramp, with what speed does it reach the bottom? Use energy equations.

Homework Equations


[/B]
Work = \Delta K
Work = \Delta E
Work = \Delta K + \Delta U_g + \Delta E_t{}_h

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand how to do this with motion equations:

VF2 = Vi2 +2ad
VF2 = 2ad

a = gsin(θ)-(FFR/m)
a = gsin(37) - (350cos(37)*0.3/35)
a = 6-2.4

VF2 = 2 * 3.6 * 8
VF2 = 57.6
VF = 7.6
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
But I am at lost with energy equations

I calculated the Net Work of the system by calculating the Work of each Force and adding them together and I got 1020 J.
I want to plug this into either one of these equations:

Work = \Delta K
1020 = (1/2)mv2

Work = \Delta K + \Delta U_g + \Delta E_t{}_h
1020 = (1/2)mv2 + mgy + FFR * d

But what I don't understand is how the first equation can be equal to the second equation. Wouldn't I get a different answer? Why is the change in kinetic energy alone enough to demonstrate the change in all of the energies?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Foopyblue said:
But I am at lost with energy equations

I calculated the Net Work of the system by calculating the Work of each Force and adding them together and I got 1020 J.
I want to plug this into either one of these equations:

Work = \Delta K
1020 = (1/2)mv2

Work = \Delta K + \Delta U_g + \Delta E_t{}_h
1020 = (1/2)mv2 + mgy + FFR * d

But what I don't understand is how the first equation can be equal to the second equation. Wouldn't I get a different answer? Why is the change in kinetic energy alone enough to demonstrate the change in all of the energies?

When using an equation, you need to know what the notations mean in it. The three equations you quoted do not mean the same work. Read the context in the text.
.
And look after Work-Energy Theorem in your notes of book. What does it say?
 
This is what my textbook says for each equation.

Work=ΔE
The total energy of a system changes by the amount of work done on it.

Another way to right the equation above is by listing the specific types of energies found in the system.

The only energies I found in this system were Kinetic, Potential due to gravity, and Thermal so:

Work=ΔK+ΔUg+ΔEth

Work=ΔK
A system gains or loses kinetic energy by transferring it through work between the environment (forces being introduced into the system) and the system.
 
So if I chose my system to be just the block, I would only have to worry about Kinetic Energy and this is why Work=ΔK works?
 
I tried thinking about this more deeply. The Law of Conservation of energy states that the total energy of an isolated system is conserved so that its change is zero. If I choose my system to be the Earth, the inclined plane, and the block, then for this problem, it is indeed isolated. This would mean that no work is done. Thus

Work = ΔE
Work = ΔK + ΔUg + ΔEth
0 = ΔK + ΔUg + ΔEth
0 = (Kf - Ki) + (Ugf - Ugi) + ΔEth
0 = (\frac{1}{2}mv_f^2-\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2)+(mgh_f-mgh_i)+F_F*d
vi=0 and hf=0 so the 2nd term and 3rd term go away
0 = \frac{1}{2}mv_f^2-mgh_i+F_F*d
Friction force is Normal Force times coefficient of kinetic friction, so
0 = \frac{1}{2}mv_f^2-mgh_i+(F_N*\mu_k*d)
The initial height can be found with trig functions, hypotenuse is 8, searching for opposite side 8sin(37)= 4.8
Normal force is Wcos(37) W = 35*9.8 = 343 343cos(37)= 274
Coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.3
0 = \frac{1}{2}*35*v_f^2-35*9.8*4.8+(274*0.3*8)
0 = 17.5v_f^2-1646.4+657.6
0 = 17.5v_f^2-988.8
-17.5v_f^2 = -988.8
v_f^2 = 56.5
v_f = 7.5

However a system that contains just the block would not be isolated so I would not be able to use the law of conservation of energy if I decided to work with just the block.
I can use Work=ΔK because the definition says that a system gains or loses kinetic energy by transferring it through work between the environment and the system.
I have a system, the block, that is gaining kinetic energy from the environment, the inclined plane and the earth, so I can use this equation.
There are 3 forces on the block, Gravity, Normal Force, and Friction Force. The Normal Force does no work on the system because it is perpendicular to the displacement. A component of gravity, Wsinθ, does work in the direction of movement, and the friction force does work antiparallel to the blocks movement so

(Wsinθ*d)-(Ffr*d) = Total Work
343*sin37*8-82*8 = Total Work
1650-650 = Total Work
1000 J = Total Work

So now that I know the Total Work done on the block

Work=ΔK
1000 = \frac{1}{2}mv_f^2-\frac{1}{2}mv_i^2
1000 = \frac{1}{2}*35*v_f^2-0
1000 = 17.5v_f^2
57 = v_f^2
7.6 = v_f

My numbers came out right but does this logic sound correct?
 
Foopyblue said:
My numbers came out right but does this logic sound correct?
Yes, both methods are correct, congratulation! :)
 
  • Like
Likes Foopyblue
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top