Using Fourier Analysis in a Senior Year Project: Any Experiment Ideas?

AI Thread Summary
Fourier analysis is applicable in both physics and engineering, making it suitable for a senior year project focused on a physics-related question. A straightforward experiment could involve analyzing sound waves, such as exploring pure tones and beats, which can illustrate the principles of Fourier analysis effectively. Creating a computer model to simulate these concepts is feasible, though the complexity may vary depending on the depth of the investigation. Resources are readily available online to support research and experimentation in this area. This project can bridge both mathematical and physical concepts, enriching the learning experience.
cscott
Messages
778
Reaction score
1
I'm supposed to do an "investigation into a physics-related question." for my senior year project. I want to do something realted to Fourier Analysis but I need some sort of experiment. Any ideas? How hard would a computer model be?

Also, would this topic fall more under math?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cscott said:
I'm supposed to do an "investigation into a physics-related question." for my senior year project. I want to do something realted to Fourier Analysis but I need some sort of experiment. Any ideas? How hard would a computer model be?

Also, would this topic fall more under math?
`
Fourier analysis could be treated as a purely mathematical topic but it has a lot of very important applications in both physics and engineering.

The simplest and most easy to explain to non scientists application is probably the application to the analysis of sound waves. A pure tone (closely approximated by a tuning fork) is a single harmonic. Then you can move on to beats (two modes close in frequencies) and then to the spectrum of different musical instruments.

I am sure you can find a huge number of pages on the web on these topics.

Just a thought.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top