Using golf ball dimples to decrease vaccuum drag on motor vehicles and aircraft.

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the potential application of golf ball dimples to reduce vacuum drag on motor vehicles and aircraft. Participants explore the aerodynamic principles behind dimples, their effects on drag, and the feasibility of implementing similar designs in automotive and aviation contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Experimental/applied

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants explain that a dimpled golf ball experiences less drag due to turbulence created by the dimples, which reduces the vacuum behind the ball.
  • Others mention that vortex generators are already used in aviation to manage airflow and reduce drag, suggesting a similar principle could apply to vehicles.
  • A participant cites a Mythbusters experiment claiming a significant increase in fuel economy for a dimpled automobile, raising questions about the practicality of such modifications.
  • Some argue that while dimples may reduce drag for spheres at certain Reynolds numbers, they may not be beneficial for the aerodynamic shapes of cars and aircraft.
  • There is a contention regarding the relationship between turbulence and flow separation, with some asserting that turbulence is not synonymous with stall conditions.
  • A participant introduces the idea of using plasma fields to reduce drag, suggesting it as an area of ongoing interest, though its commercial viability remains uncertain.
  • Concerns are raised about the validity of the Mythbusters test, with some participants questioning the experimental setup and its implications for real-world applications.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion features multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness of dimples in reducing drag on vehicles and aircraft. There is no consensus on whether the principles observed in golf balls can be directly applied to automotive or aviation designs.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the applicability of findings from experiments on golf balls to other aerodynamic shapes. There are also unresolved discussions about the conditions under which dimples may or may not be effective, particularly concerning Reynolds numbers and flow characteristics.

  • #31
The best way to compare the performance of a car body with golf ball dimples or vortex generators with a regular car body is to calculate or research the drag coefficients and the force and power produced by the vacuum drag and produce a table that will list all of these values for the three aerodynamic profiles to perform an accurate comparison. Of course other variables such as the cross-sectional area of the body and the weight of the body will have to be standardized for the comparison of performance factors to be accurate.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #32
the paper...
http://www.4g63.de/facts/vortexgenerator-evo-mitsu.pdf

Mech_Engineer said:
On a side note, I've seen at least one production car with vortex generators very similar to ones used on airplanes; the Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution VIII. Whether they're helpful in terms of mileage, no idea.

mitsubishi-lancer-evolution-viii-mr-fq-400-top-3_124.jpg

2005-Lancer-Evolution-VIII-MR-FQ-400-RA-1024x768.jpg


turp_0901_09_z+project_mitsubishi_lancer_evolution_ix_interior_exterior+vortex_generators.jpg
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
6K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
8K