Using Graphing Paper for Physics and Math Coursework

AI Thread Summary
Graphing paper is favored by some for its ability to keep work organized and neat, particularly in physics and math classes. However, issues with readability have been noted, especially with certain types like the 5x5 graphing paper from Walmart. Alternatives such as blank computer paper and engineering paper are suggested, with users appreciating the flexibility of blank pages for organizing equations and explanations without the constraints of grid lines. Engineering paper is available at college bookstores, but its cost of $9.00 for 200 sheets is considered high by some. Overall, personal preference plays a significant role in the choice of paper, with many leaning towards blank or calculation paper as more effective options for complex work, especially as subjects progress into three-dimensional concepts.
WillofMalazan
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Does anyone use graphing paper for Physics, as well as Math classwork? I like graphing paper, but the kind I use (5x5 from Walmart) doesn't seem to be working out very well. I am having a difficult time reading what I am writing on the paper. I like using graphing paper because it allows me to keep my work straight and neat. I know this is probably a silly question, but I just wanted to know what everyone else uses.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I prefer computer paper. It's open, white, and blank. I can organize each page however I like, I can throw equations down one side and write physical explanations on the other, I can change my spacing without having the lines strike my words or math...
Personal preference.
Once you get into 3D, you'll probably give up on graph paper in all honesty.
 
Use calculation paper, not graph paper
 
PhanthomJay said:
Use calculation paper, not graph paper
We have engineering paper in our college bookstore. It's $9.00 for 200 sheets. Is that expensive for engineering paper?
 
Like the person above who uses computer paper, I also find this very helpful. You can get a sketch book with ~100 blank white sheets in it for maybe like $3. I use this for all of my classes.
 
  • Like
Likes BiGyElLoWhAt
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
864
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
71
Views
713
Replies
60
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top