Using Kepler's Laws to find the mass of a star

  • Thread starter Thread starter jamesc5
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laws Mass Star
AI Thread Summary
To find the mass of a star based on the orbital radius and period of its planet, the correct approach involves using Kepler's laws. The initial attempt incorrectly used the orbital period in days instead of converting it to seconds, which is essential for accurate calculations. After converting the period to seconds, the equation was adjusted, but the user still faced issues with the results. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using the correct formula and units in calculations related to celestial mechanics. Accurate application of Kepler's laws is crucial for determining stellar masses effectively.
jamesc5
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


In recent years, a number of nearby stars have been found to possesses planets. Suppose, the orbital radius of such a planet is found to be 4.9 1011 m, with a period of 1280 days. Find the mass of the star.


Homework Equations


T^2=4pi√((r^3)/Gm))


The Attempt at a Solution


(1280)^2=4pi√((4.9E11)^3/(6.67E-11)m)
1638400=4pi√((1.17649E35)/(6.67E-11)m)
1286796.351=√((1.17649E35)/(6.67E-11)m)
1.655844849E12=(1.17649E35)/(6.67E-11)m)
110.4448514m=6.67E-11
m=6.039E-13

I thought this was the right solution; however, I am not getting the correct answer as I am doing it online and it tells me I am doing it wrong. Am I using the wrong equation?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I see at least two mistakes. The equation is wrong (c.f. Wikipedia); the period must be expressed in seconds, not days.
 
welcome to pf!

hi james! welcome to pf! :smile:
jamesc5 said:
… with a period of 1280 days

(1280)^2=4pi√((4.9E11)^3/(6.67E-11)m)

days ! :wink:
 
voko said:
I see at least two mistakes. The equation is wrong (c.f. Wikipedia); the period must be expressed in seconds, not days.

I tried switching days to seconds and i got T=110592000 seconds so i changed my equation...

(11059200)^2=4pi√((4.9E11)^3)/(6.67E-11)m)
9.733E14=√((4.9E11)^3)/(6.67E-11)m)
9.473E29=((4.9E11)^3)/(6.67E-11)m)
(1.42E40)m=(4.9E11)^3
m=8.234E-6

I changed it to seconds, but I still don't seem to be getting the right answer.
 
The equation is start with is wrong. I mean this one: T^2=4pi√((r^3)/Gm)) As I said. look up the correct equation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top